MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403153313 · doi:10.1210/jendso/bvae163.1361

12571 Ultrasonography Is A Potential Cost-effective Tool To Evaluate Muscle Impairment In Patients With Controlled Cushing’S Disease And Acromegaly

2024· article· en· W4403153313 on OpenAlexaff
Luciana Martel‐Duguech, Helena Bascuñana, Susan M. Webb, Elena Valassi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Endocrine Society · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcromegalyMedicineUltrasonographyDiseaseCushing's diseaseRadiologyInternal medicineGrowth hormoneHormone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Disclosure: L. Martel-Duguech: None. H. Bascuñana: None. S. Webb: None. E. Valassi: None. Myopathy is a frequent feature in patients with Cushing’s syndrome (CS) and in patients with acromegaly (ACRO) long-term after biochemical control is achieved. Although ultrasonography (US) is an easy and cost-effective tool to evaluate muscle impairment in the clinical setting, its usefulness in patients with “controlled” ACRO end CS patients has not been established The aim of our study was to evaluate muscle structure using US and assess the correlation between US parameters, muscle function and quality of life (QoL). We included 36 female patients with CS [mean (±SD) age, 50±12 years; mean (±SD) BMI, 26.7±3.8] and 36 age- and BMI-matched healthy women. Mean (±SD) duration of remission was 132±87 months. We also included 36 patients with ACRO [20 females and 16 males, mean (±SD) age, 53±9 years, BMI 27±4 Kg/m2 and duration of control 92±58 months], and 36 age, gender and BMI-matched controls. We obtained transverse ultrasound images of the rectus femoris and assessed muscle intensity at both the midpoint (QmitR) and the distal third (QtercR), between the anterior inferior iliac spine and the proximal end of the patella. We scored muscle intensity using the Heckmatt’s rating scale and classified our findings as follows: 1-normal, 2-mildy increased muscle echoes with normal bone reflection, 3-moderately increased muscle echoes with reduced bone, 4-severely increased muscle echoes with absent bone reflection. We found that mean US intensity score was increased in patients with CS (QmitR p<0.001) and in patients with ACRO (QmitR p<0.05; QtercR p<0.001) vs. the controls, suggesting more impaired muscle architecture in the former, likely due to fibrosis/fatty infiltration. We also measured muscle function using the following tests: gait speed velocity (GS), timed up and go (TUG) and 30-second chair stand. QoL was assessed using both generic (SF-36) and disease-specific (CushingQoL and AcroQoL) questionnaires. US parameters, QoL and muscle function were correlated; in CS patients, higher QtercR was associated with slower GS (r=-0.421, p=0.041) and lower scores in social dimensions on CushingQoL ( friends/family , r=-0.510, p=0.013; and work/study, r=-0.523, p=0.010) . In ACRO patients, higher QmedR was associated with slower GS (r=-0.382, p=0.031) and decreased TUG (r=-0.497, p=0.004) and 30-second chair stand (r=-0.444, p=0.011) in all patients. Higher QmedR was also associated with lower score in physical function (ρ=-0.734, p=0.024), vitality (ρ=-0.728, p=0.026), and AcroQoL total score (ρ=-0.725, p=0.027), in male patients only. Conclusion: muscle US architectural parameters are impaired in “controlled” CS and ACRO patients, and are correlated with muscle function and QoL in both groups of patients. US may be a useful technique to identify, in a clinical setting, those CS and ACRO patients showing residual myopathy. This work was supported by PI17/00749 and PI21/01223 and FEDER funds Presentation: 6/3/2024

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.340

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Endocrine SocietySame topicPituitary Gland Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207