The effect of stannous fluoride desensitizing toothpaste on immediate dentin sealing ability of universal adhesive in vitro
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The stannous fluoride pretreatment of dentin may compromise the bond formation of the dentinal adhesive system. This study aimed to determine the effect of stannous fluoride (SnF 2 ) desensitizing toothpaste on immediate dentin sealing ability (IDS) of universal adhesive in human intact dentin using dentin permeability test and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS). Sixty sound dentin specimens were prepared from 60 extracted intact third molars, then treated with 17 % EDTA for 60 s to simulate hypersensitive dentin, and randomly divided into 2 series. Series 1 (dentin permeability test; n = 40) had 4 different treatment groups: (1) universal adhesive (self-etch mode), (2) universal adhesive (total-etch mode), (3) SnF 2 pretreatment + universal adhesive (self-etch), (4) SnF 2 pretreatment + universal adhesive (total-etch). The IDS of each group was the percentage decrease of hydraulic conductance of dentin after bonding. Series 2 (n = 20) was SEM-EDS analysis of different treated dentin before bonding. The data were analyzed using 2-way ANOVA and Tukey test. In groups of no SnF 2 pretreatment, the IDS of universal adhesive were 79.53 ± 20.71 and 77.34 ± 18.14 % for self-etch and total-etch mode, respectively. In groups of SnF 2 pretreatment, the corresponding values were 71.54 ± 15.56 and 69.56 ± 9.92 %, respectively. Although SnF 2 pretreated-dentin had the remarkable signals of silicon and tin, there were no significant reductions in the IDS of universal adhesive ( P < 0.05). SnF 2 desensitizing toothpaste has no adverse effect on the immediate dentin sealing ability of universal adhesive.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".