MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403157589 · doi:10.1016/j.biosx.2024.100549

An electroactive microfluidic platform integrated with AM-pDEP focusing and side-counter design for selective cell sorting and single-cell quantification

2024· article· en· W4403157589 on OpenAlexafffund
Zuyuan Tian, Mohamed Shaheen, Tianxiang Jiang, Shaoxi Wang, Xihua Wang, Jie Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueBiosensors and Bioelectronics X · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrofluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersChina Scholarship CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacsChina Sponsorship Council
KeywordsSortingMicrofluidicsNanotechnologyComputer scienceMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rapid isolation and precise quantification of target cancer cells are crucial for precision medicine applications. Conventional fluorescence-based methods require bulky optical instrumentation and specialized expertise. Recent advances in label-free microfluidic techniques have attempted to overcome these limitations but often suffer from reduced reliability and throughput when integrating multiple functions. Here, we demonstrate an electroactive microfluidic platform that integrates functions of selective concentration, particle focusing, and single-cell level quantification without introducing additional complex physical microstructures. Our device employs the dielectrophoresis (DEP) effect combined with an interdigitated cell sorter to achieve selective cell concentration. For quantification and characterization, the device leverages the impedimetric Coulter principle to achieve precise particle counting and characterization at single-cell resolution. To address the inherent tradeoff between sensitivity and throughput in the traditional Coulter counter, we utilize the tilted interdigitated electrode configuration excited by an amplitude-modulated (AM) Positive DEP (pDEP) signal instead of the commonly employed narrow channel or sheath flow to realize the effective focusing and alignment of the cell stream. The focusing module is combined with our side-counter design to detect cells. The performance of our device and its embedded modules has been verified with mixed breast cancer and blood model cell lines, where high consistency between optical and electrical detection has been demonstrated. We expect the integration of the proposed AM-pDEP focusing approach and the corresponding microfluidic design for cell sorter and on-chip flow cytometry would offer an alternative engineering solution to the stream-based on-chip single-cell analysis where reliable cell focusing and single-cell sensing are required.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiosensors and Bioelectronics XSame topicMicrofluidic and Bio-sensing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207