Hyperoxia does not improve the acute upper thermal tolerance of a tropical marine fish (<i>Lutjanus apodus</i>)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fish can experience hyperoxia in shallow environments due to photosynthetic activity and this has been suggested to provide them with a metabolic refuge during acute warming. However, this hypothesis has never been tested on a tropical marine species. Thus, we fitted 29°C-acclimated wild schoolmaster snapper (Lutjanus apodus; a species known to experience diel hyperoxia in mangrove creeks and coastal waters) with Transonic® flow probes and exposed them to an acute increase in temperature (at 1°C h-1) in respirometers under normoxia and hyperoxia (150% air saturation), until their critical thermal maximum (CTmax). The CTmax of both groups was ∼39°C, and no differences in maximum cardiac function were recorded as the fish were warmed. However, temperature-induced factorial aerobic scope was significantly greater in fish tested under hyperoxia. These data suggest that hyperoxia will not protect coastal tropical fish species during marine heat waves, despite its effects on metabolic scope/capacity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".