MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403179038 · doi:10.1186/s12982-024-00248-0

A descriptive overview of healthy relationship programs for Indigenous youth in Canada: an integrated environmental scan

2024· article· en· W4403179038 on OpenAlexaffabout
Carolyn M. Melro, Isabella Kakish, Nicole D’souza, Gregory Brass, Clifford Ballantyne, Patricia Boksa, Christopher J. Mushquash, Srividya N. Iyer

Bibliographic record

VenueDiscover Public Health · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMentoring and Academic Development
Canadian institutionsThunder Bay Regional Health Sciences CentreThunder Bay Regional Research InstituteWiLAN (Canada)Jewish General HospitalLakehead UniversityMcGill UniversityDouglas Mental Health University Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousDescriptive researchDescriptive statisticsGeographyPsychologySocioeconomicsPolitical scienceEnvironmental resource managementEnvironmental planningSociologySocial scienceEnvironmental scienceEcologyStatisticsBiologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The legacy of structural and colonial violence has disrupted attachment which has led to the breakdown of healthy relationships within some Indigenous families and communities. A key component of re-establishing attachment is through addressing the effect of historical and on-going colonalism (e.g., intergenerational trauma, cultural connectedness) on individual, family, and community relationships. We conducted a descriptive environmental scan of web-based resources and complemented it with community reports from conversations with key Indigenous stakeholders, to identify and describe what programs are available to Indigenous youth within community settings that focus on fostering healthy relations. Qualitative descriptive summaries were used to synthesize information, summary statistics and frequencies described commonalities across programs, and pattern analysis identified patterns within the data based on demographic factors. In total, forty-seven programs were found across thirty-four organizations. Programs integrated cultivating healthy relationships by focusing on skill training (55%), Indigenous cultural education and activities (42%), and mentorship (25%). Programs described the relationships they focused on in broad terms such as healthy relationships, intergenerational relations, and relationships with the land. Programs differed based on gender and age; programs designed for girls focused on self-empowerment and those for boys on violence prevention training. Programs for younger youth aimed to foster positive identity, those for teenagers on relationship building, and those for older youth on promoting mental health. These findings highlight distinct features of healthy relationship programming for Indigenous youth in Canada and offers promising avenues in the future development of such programming based on age and gender. These findings may be of interest to healthcare service research or decision-makers looking to develop healthy relationship programs in Indigenous contexts to develop culturally-relevant and trauma-informed programming to address the effects of historical and on-going colonalism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.322
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.177
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiscover Public HealthSame topicMentoring and Academic DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207