MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403182013 · doi:10.23919/jcin.2024.10707104

Digital-Twin Enabled Time Ahead Resource Allocation for Integrated Fiber-Wireless Connected Vehicular Network

2024· article· en· W4403182013 on OpenAlexaff
Akshita Gupta, Saurabh Jaiswal, Martin Maier, Vivek Ashok Bohara, Anand Srivastava

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Communications and Information Networks · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDigital Transformation in Industry
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkWirelessWireless networkResource (disambiguation)Telecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The digital twin (DT) is envisaged as a catalyst for pioneering ecosystems of service provision within an immersive environment born from the convergence of virtual and physical realms. Specifically, DT could enhance the performance of edge-intelligent connected vehicular networks by allocating network resources efficiently based on the key performance indicators (KPIs) of vehicular data traffic. Consequently, this work addresses the key challenge of computation and spectrum resource allocation for vehicular networks. To allocate the optimal resource allocation, we subdivided the problem into: traffic classification, collective learning, and resource allocation scheme. In order to do so, this paper concentrates on two crucial vehicular applications: brake application and lane-change application. We utilize a random forest model to collectively learn vehicular data traffic in the upcoming time slot. Thereafter, a time-ahead resource allocation algorithm is proposed to improve the quality of service (QoS) by intelligently offloading vehicular data traffic to a DT-based integrated fiber-wireless (Fi-Wi) connected vehicular network. We evaluate the performance of the resource allocation strategy in terms of resources required by the network alongside the packet loss rate. It was observed that there was a 44.74% increase in cost as the total computation resources increased from F = 50 to 100 GHz, whereas the PLR of the network decreased by 71.43%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Communications and Information NetworksSame topicDigital Transformation in IndustryFrench-language works237,207