Genome-wide scan of Flortaucipir PET levels finds <i>JARID2</i> associated with cerebral tau deposition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract BACKGROUND Genetic research on Alzheimer’s disease (AD) has primarily focused on amyloid-β (Aβ) pathogenesis, with fewer studies exploring tau pathology. Elucidating the genetic basis of tau pathology could identify novel pathways in AD. METHODS We conducted a genome-wide association study of tau standard uptake value ratios (SUVRs) from [18] F-flortaucipir positron emission tomography (PET) images to identify genetic variants underlying Tau pathology. Genetic data and tau-SUVRs from [18] F-flortaucipir PET images were acquired from the A4 (311 with preclinical AD) and ADNI (280 cognitively normal, 76 with mild cognitive impairment, and 19 AD patients) studies. Circulating plasma proteins in UK Biobank Pharma Proteomics Project (UKBPPP, N=54,129) were used to validate genetic findings. SNP genotypes were tested for association with Tau-SUVR levels adjusting for age, sex and population substructure variables. AD association of polygenic risk scores (PRS) of tau and amyloid-SUVRs were assessed. Causal effect of plasma protein levels on Tau pathology were tested using Mendelian randomization analyses. RESULTS GWAS of tau-SUVR revealed two significant loci: rs78636169 ( P =5.76×10 -10 ) in JARID2 and rs7292124 ( P =2.20×10 -8 ) near ISX . Gene-based analysis of tau deposition highlighted APOE ( P =2.55×10 -6 ), CTNNA3 ( P =2.86×10 -6 ) and JARID2 ( P =1.23×10 -4 ), a component of the PRC2 multi-protein complex which regulates gene expression. Mendelian randomization analysis of available circulating plasma proteins in the UK Biobank Pharma Proteomics Project (UKBPPP) identified LRRFIP1, a protein that binds with PRC2 multi-protein complex, as potentially causally linked to tau pathology. Genes associated with both amyloid and tau pathologies were enriched in endocytosis and signal transduction pathways. AD polygenic risk score (PRS) was associated with amyloid-SUVR but not with tau-SUVR. Amyloid-SUVR PRS had a notable association with AD clinical status, particularly in younger APOE -ε4 carriers, whereas tau-SUVR PRS showed a stronger association in older carriers. CONCLUSION We identified a novel potential therapeutic target, JARID2 in the PRC2 multi-protein complex, for tau pathology. Furthermore, gene pathway analysis clarified the distinct roles of Aβ and tau in AD progression, underscoring the complexity of genetic influences across different stages of the disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".