Mobile Phase Contaminants Affect Neutral Lipid Analysis in LC-MS-Based Lipidomics Studies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lipidomics is a well-established field, enabled by modern liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS) technology, rapidly generating large amounts of data. Lipid extracts derived from biological samples are complex, and most spectral features in LC-MS lipidomics data sets remain unidentified. In-depth analyses of commercial triacylglycerol, diacylglycerol, and cholesterol ester standards revealed the expected ammoniated and sodiated ions as well as five additional unidentified higher mass peaks with relatively high intensities. The identities and origin of these unknown peaks were investigated by modifying the chromatographic mobile-phase components and LC-MS source parameters. Tandem MS (MS/MS) of each unknown adduct peak yielded no lipid structural information, producing only an intense ion of the adducted species. The unknown adducts were identified as low-mass contaminants originating from methanol and isopropanol in the mobile phase. Each contaminant was determined to be an alkylated amine species using their monoisotopic masses to calculate molecular formulas. Analysis of bovine liver extract identified 33 neutral lipids with an additional 73 alkyl amine adducts. Analysis of LC-MS-grade methanol and isopropanol from different vendors revealed substantial alkylated amine contamination in one out of three different brands that were tested. Substituting solvents for ones with lower levels of alkyl amine contamination increased lipid annotations by 36.5% or 27.4%, depending on the vendor, and resulted in >2.5-fold increases in peak area for neutral lipid species without affecting polar lipid analysis. These findings demonstrate the importance of solvent selection and disclosure for lipidomics protocols and highlight some of the major challenges when comparing data between experiments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".