MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403208680 · doi:10.1093/brain/awae312

Somatic instability of the <i>FGF14</i> -SCA27B GAA•TTC repeat reveals a marked expansion bias in the cerebellum

2024· article· en· W4403208680 on OpenAlexafffund
David Pellerin, Jean‐Loup Méreaux, Susana Boluda, Matt C. Danzi, Marie-Josée Dicaire, Claire-Sophie Davoine, David Genı́s, Guinevere Spurdens, Catherine Ashton, Jillian M. Hammond, Brandon J. Gerhart, Viorica Chelban, Phuong Uyen Le, Maryam Safisamghabadi, Christopher Yanick, Hamin Lee, Sathiji Nageshwaran, Gabriel Matos‐Rodrigues, Zane Jaunmuktane, Kevin Petrecca, Schahram Akbarian, André Nussenzweig, Karen Usdin, M. Renaud, Céline Bonnet, Gianina Ravenscroft, Mario Saporta, Jill S. Napierala, Henry Houlden, Ira W. Deveson, Марек Напиерала, Alexis Brice, Laura Molina‐Porcel, Danielle Seilhean, Stephan Züchner, Alexandra Dürr, Bernard Brais

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicGenetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
FundersFondation Groupe MonacoAssociation of British NeurologistsMedical Research Future FundNational Cancer InstituteNational Institute on Drug AbuseAtaxia UKMedical Research CouncilRosetrees TrustNational Institutes of HealthAlzheimer’s Research UKNorges IdrettshøgskoleNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchFondation pour la Recherche MédicaleUCLH Biomedical Research CentreNational Health and Medical Research CouncilMultiple System Atrophy CoalitionKoning BoudewijnstichtingUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustMultiple System Atrophy TrustWellcome TrustFriedreich's Ataxia Research AllianceUniversity College London Hospitals Biomedical Research CentreCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchGuarantors of BrainMichael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research
KeywordsTrinucleotide repeat expansionCerebellumAtaxiaSomatic cellSpinocerebellar ataxiaBiologyNeuroscienceGeneticsAlleleGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Spinocerebellar ataxia 27B (SCA27B) is a common autosomal dominant ataxia caused by an intronic GAA•TTC repeat expansion in FGF14. Neuropathological studies have shown that neuronal loss is largely restricted to the cerebellum. Although the repeat locus is highly unstable during intergenerational transmission, it remains unknown whether it exhibits cerebral mosaicism and progressive instability throughout life. We conducted an analysis of the FGF14 GAA•TTC repeat somatic instability across 156 serial blood samples from 69 individuals, fibroblasts, induced pluripotent stem cells and post-mortem brain tissues from six controls and six patients with SCA27B, alongside methylation profiling using targeted long-read sequencing. Peripheral tissues exhibited minimal somatic instability, which did not significantly change over periods of more than 20 years. In post-mortem brains, the GAA•TTC repeat was remarkably stable across all regions, except in the cerebellar hemispheres and vermis. The levels of somatic expansion in the cerebellar hemispheres and vermis were, on average, 3.15 and 2.72 times greater relative to other examined brain regions, respectively. Additionally, levels of somatic expansion in the brain increased with repeat length and tissue expression of FGF14. We found no significant difference in methylation of wild-type and expanded FGF14 alleles in post-mortem cerebellar hemispheres between patients and controls. In conclusion, our study revealed that the FGF14 GAA•TTC repeat exhibits a cerebellar-specific expansion bias, which may explain the pure cerebellar involvement in SCA27B.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.109
Threshold uncertainty score0.528

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrainSame topicGenetic Neurodegenerative DiseasesFrench-language works237,207