The Relationships Between Activities of Daily Living, Depression, and Quality of Life in Older Adults with Multiple Chronic Conditions: A Path Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to determine the relationships between activities of daily living (ADL), depression, and quality of life. Specifically, the study aimed to evaluate the potential mediating role of depression in the relationship between activities of daily living and quality of life in a sample of Iranian older adults. METHODS: This cross-sectional study recruited 118 older adult adults with multiple chronic conditions in Iran from December 2022 to September 2023. Data were collected using a demographic and health information questionnaire, the Katz Index, the Lawton scale, Old-World Health Organization Quality of Life, and the Geriatric Depression Scale. Path analysis was used to test the hypothesis. RESULTS: = .006). CONCLUSIONS: According to the results of this study, functional status can directly and also, indirectly affect the quality of life of older adults with multiple chronic conditions through depression. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Health care providers are advised to carefully assess older adults' mental health and functional status and consider their relationships to quality of life.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".