MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403238427 · doi:10.29313/bcsurp.v4i3.13847

Resistensi Pedagang Kaki Lima di Jl. Ahmad Yani dan Jl. Cikuray pada Kebijakan Relokasi ke Gedung PKL Intan Medina Kabupaten Garut

2024· article· en· W4403238427 on OpenAlexaff
Ferdian Hilmi Riswandi, Verry Damayanti

Bibliographic record

VenueBandung Conference Series Urban & Regional Planning · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical and construction materials studies
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnimal scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Garut Regency is one of the areas with a fairly high development of the number of street vendors, especially in Garut Kota District, resulting in irregular traffic, both vehicle movements on the road body and pedestrian movements on pedestrian paths and reduced urbanaesthetic value so that it seems shabby. Efforts to organize and regulate street vendors carried out by the Garut Regency Government are by relocating street vendors, especially those in the red zone, especially on Jl. Ahmad Yani and Jl. Cikuray to the Intan Medina PKL Building in 2015. The Intan Medina PKL Building, which was originally planned as a street vendors relocation location, in fact until 2023 the building has not functioned optimally and is abandoned. The relocation policy carried out by the Garut Regency Government is considered to reduce the opportunities and income of street vendors so that resistance occurs. This study aims to identify the forms and causes of street vendors resistance on Jl. Ahmad Yani and Jl. Cikuray to the relocation policy to the Intan Medina PKL Building. The approach method in this study is descriptive research with a qualitative approach. The research method involved field observations and in-depth interviews with street vendors and related policy stakeholders. The forms of resistance of street vendors vary, ranging from open resistance or rejection such as demonstrations, installation of rejection banners and closed resistance such as pretending not to know and still selling at the initial location. The causes of resistance of street vendors include relocation locations far from crowds, long adaptation times, fears of losing buyers, and declining income of traders. Abstrak. Kabupaten Garut menjadi salah satu wilayah dengan perkembangan jumlah PKL yang cukup tinggi khususnya di Kecamatan Garut Kota sehingga mengakibatkan lalu lintas yang menjadi tidak teratur baik pergerakan kendaraan di badan jalan maupun pergerakan pejalan kaki di jalur pedestrian dan berkurangnya nilai estetika perkotaan sehingga terkesan kumuh. Upaya penataan dan penertiban PKL yang dilakukan oleh Pemerintah Kabupaten Garut yaitu dengan kebijakan merelokasi PKL terutama yang berada di zona merah khususnya di Jl. Ahmad Yani dan Jl. Cikuray ke Gedung PKL Intan Medina pada tahun 2015. Gedung PKL Intan Medina yang pada awalnya direncanakan sebagai lokasi relokasi PKL pada kenyataannya hingga tahun 2023 gedung tersebut belum berfungsi secara optimal dan terbengkalai. Kebijakan relokasi yang dilakukan oleh Pemerintah Kabupaten Garut dianggap menurunkan peluang dan pendapatan para PKL sehingga terjadinya resistensi. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengidentifikasi bentuk dan penyebab resistensi PKL di Jl. Ahmad Yani dan Jl. Cikuray Terhadap kebijakan relokasi ke Gedung PKL Intan Medina. Metode pendekatan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian deskriptif dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Metode penelitian melibatkan observasi lapangan dan wawancara mandalam terhadap pedagang kaki lima dan pemangku kebijakan terkait. Bentuk resistensi para pedagang kaki lima beragam, mulai dari resistensi atau penolakan terbuka seperti demonstrasi, pemasangan spanduk penolakan serta resistensi tertutup seperti pura-pura tidak tahu dan tetap berjualan di lokasi awal. Penyebab resistensi para pedagang kaki lima diantaranya meliputi lokasi relokasi yang jauh dari keramaian, waktu adaptasi yang lama, kekhawatiran kehilangan pembeli, serta menurunnya pendapatan para pedagang.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.049

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBandung Conference Series Urban & Regional PlanningSame topicGeotechnical and construction materials studiesFrench-language works237,207