Arahan Pengembangan Kampung Kreatif di Sekitar Kawasan Heritage Braga berdasarkan Partisipasi Masyarakat
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. The Braga conservation area, like other old town conservation areas in major cities in Indonesia, has experienced a decline in quality and activity. Reviving the function of buildings in the Braga area is essential. With the passage of time, the preservation of this Heritage Area may be threatened, and social inequality in Kampung Braga could increase. Therefore, the role of the community must be strengthened to support the conservation of this Heritage Area and to boost the economy by transforming Kampung Braga into a Creative Village. The method used in this study is the SKS (Survei Kampung Sendiri) method, aiming to identify the potential and problems in Kampung Braga based on community participation. Based on the SKS (Survei Kampung Sendiri) analysis, several issues have been identified, including aspects of infrastructure, creative village facilities, land use, landmarks, and activity support. Kampung Braga has the potential to be developed into a Creative Village due to its strategic location. Additionally, Kampung Braga features a co-working space, mural attractions, culinary spots, and more. Therefore, in the effort to develop Kampung Braga, several aspects need attention, such as improving or constructing infrastructure, providing facilities and programs for the Creative Village, offering regular training programs to tourism management organizations, and increasing community participation in the development of the Creative Village. Abstrak. Kawasan konservasi Braga, seperti kawasan konservasi kota tua di kota-kota besar di Indonesia, telah mengalami penurunan kualitas dan aktivitas. Menghidupkan kembali fungsi bangunan di kawasan Braga. Dengan berkembangnya zaman bisa saja mengancam kelestarian Kawasan Heritage dan membuat ketimpangan sosial di Kampung Braga semakin meningkat, maka peran masyarakat harus lebih ditingkatkan untuk ikut serta dalam mendukung konservasi Kawasan Heritage tersebut dan meningkatkan perekonomian dengan alternatif penataan Kampung Braga sebagai Kampung kreatif. Metode yang digunakan untuk penelitian ini yaitu dengan metode SKS (Survei Kampung Sendiri) dengan tujuan untuk mengetahui potensi dan permasalahan yang ada di Kampung Braga berdasarkan partisipasi masyarakat. Berdasarkan analisis SKS (Survei Kampung Sendiri) yang sudah dilakukan, terdapat beberapa aspek yang menjadi permasalahan, yaitu aspek sarana dan prasarana, aspek fasilitas kampung kreatif, aspek penggunaan lahan aspek landmark dan activity support. Kampung Braga berpotensi untuk dikembangkan menjadi Kampung kreatif, dikarenakan memiliki lokasi yang strategis. Selain itu, di Kampung Braga terdapat Co-Working Space, atraksi mural, kuliner dan lain-lain. Oleh karena itu dalam upaya pengembangan Kampung Braga terdapat beberapa aspek yang harus diperhatikan diantaranya perbaikan atau pembangunan sarana dan prasarana, penyediaan fasilitas-fasilitas dan program Kampung Kreatif, program pembinaan dan pelatihan secara berkala kepada organisasi pengelola pariwisata serta peningkatan partisipasi masyarakat dalam pengembangan Kampung Kreatif.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.025 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".