MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403239385 · doi:10.29313/bcsurp.v4i3.14015

Kelayakan Fisik Pengembangan Ekowisata Kawasan Pasca Tambang

2024· article· en· W4403239385 on OpenAlexaff
Rafli Mahesa Dayu, Astri Mutia Ekasari

Bibliographic record

VenueBandung Conference Series Urban & Regional Planning · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCommunity-based Tourism Development and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Kaolin Lake Kolong Murai, also known as Blue Kaolin Lake in Belitung, is a post-mining area covering 5 hectares out of a total 66 hectares of active mining land that has now been repurposed as a tourist attraction. Despite its strategic location, the tourist appeal of this area remains underdeveloped due to limited management. As part of a post-mining reclamation area, the development of this site requires a conservative approach, with ecotourism being a viable option for further development. The physical feasibility of ecotourism development was evaluated by analyzing the environmental carrying capacity using the Cifuentes (1992) method, which includes physical carrying capacity (PCC), real carrying capacity (RCC), and effective carrying capacity (ECC). The analysis results showed that PCC > RCC > ECC, indicating that the environmental carrying capacity is still in good condition. With an average of 25 visitors per day during peak hours, the area has the capacity to accommodate up to 4,150 visitors per day, making it suitable for further development. This evaluation highlights the importance of developing the area to increase tourist numbers and ensure that the actual capacity aligns with existing conditions at the Blue Kaolin Lake tourist site. Abstrak. Danau Kaolin Kolong Murai, atau dikenal juga sebagai Danau Biru Kaolin di Belitung, merupakan area pascatambang seluas 5 hektar dari total lahan tambang aktif seluas 66 hektar yang kini beralih fungsi menjadi objek wisata. Meskipun lokasinya strategis, daya tarik wisata di kawasan ini masih kurang berkembang karena keterbatasan pengelolaan. Sebagai bagian dari kawasan reklamasi pascatambang, pengembangan kawasan ini memerlukan pendekatan yang konservatif, dan ekowisata menjadi opsi yang layak untuk dikembangkan. Evaluasi kelayakan fisik pengembangan ekowisata dilakukan dengan menganalisis daya dukung lingkungan menggunakan metode Cifuentes (1992), yang meliputi daya dukung fisik (PCC), riil (RCC), dan efektif (ECC). Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa nilai PCC>RCC>ECC, menandakan bahwa daya dukung lingkungan masih dalam kondisi baik. Dengan rata-rata 25 pengunjung per hari pada jam padat, kawasan ini memiliki kapasitas untuk menampung hingga 4.150 pengunjung per hari, sehingga masih layak untuk dikembangkan lebih lanjut. Hasil evaluasi ini menegaskan pentingnya pengembangan kawasan dalam rangka meningkatkan jumlah wisatawan dan memastikan kapasitas aktual yang sesuai dengan kondisi eksisting di objek wisata Danau Biru Kaolin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.639
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBandung Conference Series Urban & Regional PlanningSame topicCommunity-based Tourism Development and SustainabilityFrench-language works237,207