The Influence of Structural Brain Changes on Cognition in the Context of Healthy Aging: Exploring Mediation Effects Through <scp>gBAT</scp>—The Graphical Brain Association Tool
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The contribution of age-related structural brain changes to the well-established link between aging and cognitive decline is not fully defined. While both age-related regional brain atrophy and cognitive decline have been extensively studied, the specific mediating role of age-related regional brain atrophy on cognitive functions is unclear. This study introduces an open-source software tool with a graphical user interface that streamlines advanced whole-brain mediation analyses, enabling researchers to systematically explore how the brain acts as a mediator in relationships between various behavioral and health outcomes. The tool is showcased by investigating regional brain volume as a mediator to determine the contribution of age-related brain volume loss toward cognition in healthy aging. We analyzed regional brain volumes and cognitive testing data (Montreal Cognitive Assessment [MoCA]) from a cohort of 131 neurologically healthy adult participants (mean age 50 ± 20.8 years, range 20-79, 73% females) drawn from the Aging Brain Cohort Study at the University of South Carolina. Using our open-source tool developed for evaluating brain-behavior associations across the brain and optimized for exploring mediation effects, we conducted a series of mediation analyses using participant age as the predictor variable, total MoCA and MoCA subtest scores as the outcome variables, and regional brain volume as potential mediators. Age-related atrophy within specific anatomical networks was found to mediate the relationship between age and cognition across multiple cognitive domains. Specifically, atrophy in bilateral frontal, parietal, and occipital areas, along with widespread subcortical regions mediated the effect of age on total MoCA scores. Various MoCA subscores were influenced by age through atrophy in distinct brain regions. These involved prefrontal regions, sensorimotor cortex, and parieto-occipital areas for executive function subscores, prefrontal and temporo-occipital regions, along with the caudate nucleus for attention and concentration subscores, frontal and parieto-occipital areas, alongside connecting subcortical areas such as the optic tract for visuospatial subscores and frontoparietal areas for language subscores. Brain-based mediation analysis offers a causal framework for evaluating the mediating role of brain structure on the relationship between age and cognition and provides a more nuanced understanding of cognitive aging than previously possible. By validating the applicability and effectiveness of this approach and making it openly available to the scientific community, we facilitate the exploration of causal mechanisms between variables mediated by the brain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".