Detection of corrosion effects on prestressed concrete bridge deck slabs from the champlain bridge through non‐destructive testing techniques
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract As aging infrastructures raise public concerns, evaluating their performance is crucial for maintaining structural integrity, especially for corroding prestressed concrete members. These structures may experience substantial tendon cross‐sectional area loss before any visible deterioration becomes detectable. While various non‐destructive techniques (NDT) have proven effective in labs, correlating corrosion‐induced damage in field members remains a challenge. Establishing these correlations is key for understanding the overall performance of aging structural concrete elements and ensuring their continued safe operation through non‐invasive means. This paper investigates various NDTs on a concrete bridge deck, aiming to correlate results. Visual inspection, Schmidt rebound hammer, Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity (UPV), corrosion detection techniques, Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR), Ultrasonic Pulse Echo (UPE), and Impact Echo (IE) methods are evaluated for detecting concrete deck damage. Results show the methods' capabilities in detecting defects to a certain extent, highlighting their potential in assessing aging concrete infrastructures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".