MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Assessing soil fungal diversity under different sampling schemes in conjunction with remote sensing technologies in a subtropical forest

2024· article· en· W4403259614 on OpenAlexaff
Wanwan Yu, H. Xing, Chunchun Wang, Xinyue Cui, Xian Wu, Yu Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueGeoderma · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubtropicsConjunction (astronomy)Sampling (signal processing)Tropical and subtropical moist broadleaf forestsRemote sensingEnvironmental scienceDiversity (politics)Hydrology (agriculture)EcologyGeographyComputer scienceGeologyBiologyGeotechnical engineeringComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Cost-effective soil fungi mapping using DNA sequencing and RS images. • Compared eleven sampling schemes with varying intensity and location. • Optimal fungi assessment with 26 points/ha, evenly distributed. • RS synthesis better predicts fungal diversity than individuals. • Aids understanding of soil fungi response to global change in forests. Fungi, serving as real-time bioindicators to environmental changes and stressors, are crucial for effective forest conservation and management practices under ongoing global change. However, the large-scale assessment of soil fungi still encounters challenges in striking a balance between the extensive sampling costs and the limited accuracy of minimal sampling. In this study, we analyzed 1,606 soil samples collected from 625 quadrats (20 m × 20 m) within a 25-ha subtropical forest dynamic plot in East China. Our primary objective was to explore the impact of different sampling schemes, in conjunction with remote sensing (RS) technologies, on the interpolation of soil fungal diversity using Ordinary Kriging (OK) and Co-kriging (CoK) models. Our findings suggested that a sampling scheme including points at 0 m (the base points) and 8 m within each quadrat, totaling to 26 points/ha, would be a sufficient scheme. This scheme with OK model yielded comparable results to those of more intensive schemes (at 0, 2, 5 and 8 m), but required the fewest sampling points. Upon incorporating each RS variable separately into the CoK models, including two vegetation indices (normalized difference vegetation index and transformed chlorophyll absorption ratio index 2), three terrain attributes (Elevation, Aspect and Slope), and the synthesis of these RS variables, the accuracy of the predicted results was further improved for each sampling scheme. By leveraging high-precision soil DNA sequencing in conjunction with cost-effective RS technologies, this study proposes a rapid and affordable approach for monitoring soil fungal diversity on a large scale. This will facilitate data collection for understanding responses of forest soil fungi to ongoing global change.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.207
Threshold uncertainty score0.807

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeodermaSame topicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant InteractionsFrench-language works237,207