Quarter Life Crisis pada Mahasiswa Tingkat Akhir : Bagaimana peran kebersyukuran?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quarter Life Crisis merupakan suatu kondisi yang dialami individu pada masa dewasa awal dengan gambaran keadaan yang tidak stabil, banyaknya pilihan yang akan diambil, cemas, bahkan merasa putus asa. Quarter life crisis juga dialami oleh mahasiswa tingkat akhir. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui hubungan antara kebersyukuran dengan quarter life crisis pada mahasiswa tingkat akhir di Surabaya. Penelitian ini mengaplikasikan pendekatan kuantitatif korelasional. Subjek dalam penelitian ini ialah 288 mahasiswa tingkat akhir yang terdaftar di beragam program akademik di Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya selama semester ganjil 2023. Teknik analisis data menggunakan teknik korelasi product moment melalui platform SPSS 26.0 for Windows. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa adanya hubungan namun positif antara variabel kebersyukuran dengan variabel quarter life crisis. Sehingga disimpulkan bahwa semakin tinggi kebersyukuran maka semakin tinggi juga seseorang berada dalam fase quarter life crisis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".