MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403273525 · doi:10.3389/fonc.2024.1452834

The characteristics of high-risk HPV-negative cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2024· review· en· W4403273525 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Feng Guo

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Oncology · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEndometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMeta-analysisCochrane LibraryCervical cancerOncologyInternal medicineInclusion and exclusion criteriaIncidence (geometry)DiseaseCancerRelative riskMEDLINEGynecologyConfidence intervalPathologyAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: In order to comprehensive understanding of the characteristics of high-risk HPV-negative cervical cancer and aiming to provide certain evidence in the diagnosis and treatment of this kind of disease, the clinical and pathological characteristics of high-risk HPV-negative (hr-HPV-negative) cervical cancer was evaluated through systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: We employed a systematic search strategy incorporating both MeSH terms and free words across multiple databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI and Wanfang. The strategy was specifically designed to identify articles investigating risk factors or clinical characteristics of hr-HPV-negative cervical cancer. Our database search spanned from their inception until October 2023. The literature selection and data collection processes were guided by predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Each included research was independently evaluated by two reviewers using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and a meta-analysis was conducted utilizing RevMan5.4. Results: In total, nine studies published between 2013 and 2020 were included. The risk of lymph node metastasis was notably higher in hr-HPV-negative cervical cancer patients compared to hr-HPV-positive counterparts [RR=1.99, 95%CI (1.46-2.72), P<0.0001]. It was found that clinical staging of Ib2 or higher grade was significantly increased in hr-HPV-negative cervical cancer patients, as reported by seven studies [RR=1.42, 95%CI (1.15-1.77), P=0.0001]. Non-squamous carcinoma incidence, reported in seven studies, was significantly higher in hr-HPV-negative patients [RR=2.56, 95%CI (1.63-4.01), P=0.001]. Adenocarcinoma incidence was also significantly higher in hr-HPV-negative cervical cancer patients [RR=2.36, 95%CI (1.44-3.89), P=0.005]. Conclusions: Cervical cancer patients not infected by hr-HPV exhibited increased rates of lymph node metastasis, adenocarcinoma, and non-squamous carcinoma. And they were often diagnosed at more advanced stages. These variables suggest that hr-HPV-negative cervical cancer patients presented with a more severe health status at the time of their initial cancer diagnosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (broad)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.633
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0160.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in OncologySame topicEndometrial and Cervical Cancer TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207