IMAGine: An In-Memory Accelerated GEMV Engine Overlay
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Processor-in-Memory (PIM) overlays and alternative reconfigurable tile fabrics have been proposed to eliminate the von Neumann bottleneck and enable processing performance to scale with BRAM capacity. The performance of these FPGA-based PIM architectures has been limited due to a reduction of the BRAMs maximum clock frequencies and less than ideal scaling of processing elements with increased BRAM capacity. This paper presents IMAGine, an In-Memory Accelerated GEMV engine, a PIM-array accelerator that clocks at the maximum frequency of the BRAM and scales to 100% of the available BRAMs. Comparative analyses are presented showing execution speeds over existing PIM-based GEMV engines on FPGAs and achieving a $2.65 \times-3.2 \times$ faster clock. An AMD Alveo U55 implementation is presented that achieves a system clock speed of 737 MHz, providing 64 K bit-serial multiply-accumulate (MAC) units for GEMV operation. This establishes IMAGine as the fastest PIM-based GEMV overlay, outperforming even the custom PIM-based FPGA accelerators reported to date. Additionally, it surpasses TPU v1-v2 and Alibaba Hanguang 800 in clock speed while offering an equal or greater number of multiply-accumulate (MAC) units.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".