Detection of Left Atrial Remodeling by Three-Dimensional Echocardiography in Symptomatic Patients Known to Had Non-Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is one of the most prevalent inherited disorders and a common cause of sudden heart death. Left atrial (LA) dilatation frequently occurs in patients with HCM as a result of impaired left ventricular (LV) relaxation or associated involvement of LA myocardium in HCM. Methods: We enrolled 170 patients known to had HCM (non-obstructive type) and 30 healthy subjects (control group). All of them underwent two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography to measure LV dimensions, function, LA dimension, LA deformations, pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) and LV global longitudinal strain (LVGLS). LA volumes and mechanics were also measured by three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography. Results: By 2D echocardiography, patient group revealed significantly lower all LA functions vs. control group including reservoir (26 ± 4 vs. 43 ± 3, P < 0.001), conduit (-14 ± 2 vs. -25 ± 2, P < 0.001), and booster pump functions (-12 ± 2 vs. -18 ± 1, P < 0.001). PAP was significantly higher in patient group (42 ± 7 vs. 27 ± 4 in control group). LVGLS was significantly lower in patient group (-15±1.4% vs. -23±2% in control group). Using 3D speckle tracking echocardiography (STE), there were a significantly higher indexed maximum LA volume (Vmax indexed) (43.5 ± 5.6 vs. 28.7 ± 3.7, P < 0.001), but significantly lower left atrial strain at reservoir function (LASr) (24 ± 4 vs. 41 ± 3, P < 0.001), left atrial strain at conduit function (LAScd) (-13 ± 2 vs. -24 ± 2, P < 0.001), and left atrial strain at contractile function (LASct) (-11 ± 2 vs. -18 ± 1, P < 0.001). Conclusion: Three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is a feasible method for the assessment of LA remodeling, but there is adverse LA remodeling in patients with long-standing non-obstructive HCM including impaired all LA mechanics and with increased septal thickness, there are more diastolic dysfunction and more reduction of LA mechanics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".