MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403289520 · doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.10.008

Outcomes of twin pregnancies complicated by prelabor rupture of membranes before 26 weeks of gestation: systematic review and meta-analysis

2024· review· en· W4403289520 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sara Sorrenti, Asma Khalil, Fabrizio Zullo, Elena D’Alberti, A. Sasanelli, Valentina D’Ambrosio, Ilenia Mappa, F. D’Antonio, Giuseppe Rizzo, Daniele Di Mascio

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPreterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRupture of membranesGestationMeta-analysisObstetricsPregnancyGynecologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the rate of obstetric and perinatal outcomes of premature rupture of membranes (PROM) occurring before 26 weeks in twin pregnancies. DATA SOURCE: Medline, Embase, Cinahl and Web of Science databases were searched electronically up to January 2024. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: The selection criteria included both prospective and retrospective studies of twin pregnancies with PROM before 26 weeks of gestation. Case reports, case series with fewer than 5 cases, review articles, letters to the editor and editorials were excluded. Studies including both singletons and twin pregnancies were also excluded. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHOD: We used meta-analyses of proportions to combine data and assess the pooled proportions. We used a random-effect model to perform the pooled data analyses. The study was registered with the PROSPERO database (CRD 42022368057). Quality assessment of the included studies was performed usingthe Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort studies. RESULTS: Eight studies including 227 twin pregnancies were included in the analysis. The pooled proportion of termination of pregnancy (TOP) was 4.6 % (95 % CI 1.5-13.4), while the rate of selective TOP (sTOP) was 24.5 % (95 % CI 7.1-57.7). After the exclusion of cases of TOP, the overall rate of spontaneous miscarriage or fetal demise was 20.9 % (95 % CI 11.1-35.8), whereas the live birth rate of at least one twin was 71.6 % (95 % CI 61.2-80.1) of the ongoing pregnancies. The mean gestational age at delivery was 26.5 (95 % CI 25.1-28.0) weeks and the mean latency between PROM and delivery was 5.4 weeks (95 % CI 4.8-5.9) in all cases including those with fetal deaths. Neonatal outcomes showed that the overall neonatal mortality was 26.4 % (95 % CI 16.7-39.2). When focusing only on pregnancies undergoing sTOP, the observed livebirth rate was 87.7 %. The gestational age at rupture of membranes in these cases was 16.8 (95 % CI 14.9-18.6) weeks and the latency between PROM and delivery was significantly longer (19.9 (95 % CI 18.0-21.7) weeks) than that observed in unterminated pregnancies, with a mean gestational age at delivery nearly in the range of term (36.9 weeks). CONCLUSIONS: PROM in twins before 26 weeks is associated with overall high rates of adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes, and it represents a clinical challenge for both counseling and management. Larger prospective studies unified objective protocols in terms of antenatal surveillance and management are needed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.796
Threshold uncertainty score0.962

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0100.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive BiologySame topicPreterm Birth and ChorioamnionitisFrench-language works237,207