MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403292474 · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2024.10.003

Detecting and sourcing GHGs and atmospheric trace gases in a municipal waste treatment plant using coupled chemistry and isotope compositions

2024· article· en· W4403292474 on OpenAlexaff
Yaroslav Bezyk, Maciej Górka, Łukasz Kruszewski, Jarosław Nęcki, Izabela Sówka, Justyna Jońca, Paweł Jagoda, David Wîdory

Bibliographic record

VenueWaste Management · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrace gasEnvironmental chemistryAtmospheric chemistryWaste managementTRACE (psycholinguistics)Environmental scienceIsotopeAtmospheric emissionsChemistryGreenhouse gasAtmospheric sciencesEngineeringGeologyOrganic chemistryNuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Landfill quarters and composting facilities identified as high CH 4 emission zones. • Atmospheric 13 C-depleted CH 4 indicates contamination from emission hotspots. • δ 13 C-CH 4 signatures identify no predominant CH 4 production pathway. • δ 13 C-DIC of leachates is linked to the initial methanogenesis phase of active quarter. • Difference in traces concerns NO 2 , SO 2 , chlorocarbons, alkanes, benzene and alcohols. Landfill operations and waste processing facilities are important and highly heterogeneous sources of both greenhouse gases (GHGs) and non-GHG air pollutants in the atmosphere. This arises the need for detailed apportionment of waste sources in order to locate and subsequently reduce emissions from landfills. Here, a time series of in situ measurements of atmospheric trace gases and spatial allocation of specific emission source types under different processing phases and environmental conditions were conducted in and in the surroundings of a Municipal Solid Waste Treatment Plant (MSWTP) in south-western Poland. Results revealed that several individual GHG sources dominated across the waste processing facility and that GHGs concentrations displayed spatial seasonality. An increase in the ground-level CH 4 concentrations, from ∼ 30.3 to 56.3 ppmv, was observed close (∼5 – 10 m) to the major emission sources within the MSWTP. While hotspot areas generally yielded elevated CH 4 concentrations near the soil surface, these were relatively low (2.4 to 8.9 ppmv) along the facility’s fence line. The study of the corresponding δ 13 C delineated the extent of dispersion plumes downwind emission hotspots, characterized by a 13 C depletion (around 4.0 ‰) in the atmospheric CH 4 and CO 2 . For CH 4 , emissions were isotopically discriminated between the extraction wells at active quarters/cells (δ 13 C = –58.3 ± 1.1 ‰) and biogas produced in the biological waste treatment installation (δ 13 C = –62.7 ± 0.7 ‰). Most of the trace compounds (non-methane hydrocarbons, halocarbons, oxygen-bearing organic gases, ketones, nitrogenous and sulphurous gases, and other admixture compounds) detected at the ground surface were linked to the CH 4 - and CO 2 -rich spots. Despite the relatively high variability in the concentrations of organic and inorganic compounds observed at the MSWTP active zones, our results suggest that they do not have a meaningful impact on the surrounding air quality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.170
Threshold uncertainty score0.797

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWaste ManagementSame topicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas DynamicsFrench-language works237,207