MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403292916 · doi:10.26508/lsa.202403046

The hGID <sup>GID4</sup> E3 ubiquitin ligase complex targets ARHGAP11A to regulate cell migration

2024· article· en· W4403292916 on OpenAlexaff
Halil Bagci, Martin Winkler, Benjamin Grädel, Federico Uliana, Jonathan Boulais, Weaam I Mohamed, Sophia Park, Jean‐François Côté, Olivier Pertz, Matthias Peter

Bibliographic record

VenueLife Science Alliance · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicUbiquitin and proteasome pathways
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMontreal Clinical Research Institute
FundersSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungNational Science Foundation
KeywordsUbiquitin ligaseDegronDNA ligaseCell biologyUbiquitinUbiquitin-Protein LigasesCell migrationRHOABiologyHEK 293 cellsCellChemistryBiochemistryEnzymeSignal transductionReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The human CTLH/GID (hGID) complex emerged as an important E3 ligase regulating multiple cellular processes, including cell cycle progression and metabolism. However, the range of biological functions controlled by hGID remains unexplored. Here, we used proximity-dependent biotinylation (BioID2) to identify proteins interacting with the hGID complex, among them, substrate candidates that bind GID4 in a pocket-dependent manner. Biochemical and cellular assays revealed that the hGID GID4 E3 ligase binds and ubiquitinates ARHGAP11A, thereby targeting this RhoGAP for proteasomal degradation. Indeed, GID4 depletion or impeding the GID4 substrate binding pocket with the PFI-7 inhibitor stabilizes ARHGAP11A protein amounts, although it carries no functional N-terminal degron. Interestingly, GID4 inactivation impairs cell motility and directed cell movement by increasing ARHGAP11A levels at the cell periphery, where it inactivates RhoA. Together, we identified a wide range of hGID GID4 E3 ligase substrates and uncovered a unique function of the hGID GID4 E3 ligase regulating cell migration by targeting ARHGAP11A.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.350
Threshold uncertainty score0.652

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLife Science AllianceSame topicUbiquitin and proteasome pathwaysFrench-language works237,207