MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403295398 · doi:10.1186/s12887-024-05127-w

Association of vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms with caries risk in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2024· review· en· W4403295398 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Xiurong Qin, Mei Wang, Linlin Wang, Ying Xu, Shijiang Xiong

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Pediatrics · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVitamin D Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMeta-analysisCalcitriol receptorGenetic associationGeneAssociation (psychology)Vitamin D and neurologyBioinformaticsInternal medicineGeneticsSingle-nucleotide polymorphismGenotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: To investigate the association of vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene polymorphism with caries risk in children(< 18 years). METHODS: The electronic databases PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE, Web of Science, CNKI, Cqvip, and Wanfang were searched for observational studies on the relationship between VDR single nucleotide polymorphism(SNP) and caries, including cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies. Quality assessment of selected studies was conducted using the Newcastle Ottawa scale. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) values for associations of individual VDR SNP with dental caries were calculated based on four genetic models: allelic, recessive, dominant, and over-dominant. RESULTS: Of 79 studies considered, 10 (nine case-control and one cross-sectional) were selected for analysis; the studies involved seven VDR SNPs: ApaI(rs7975232),BsmI(rs1544410),FokI(rs2228570),TaqI(rs731236), TaqI/BglI(rs739837), FokI(rs10735810) and Cdx-2(rs11568820). Alleles C and T of FokI(rs10735810) were significantly differently distributed in the caries and caries-free groups (OR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.30-2.30, P = 0.03), with CC + CT genotypes at this locus associated with greater risk of developing caries than the TT genotype (OR = 1.87, 95%CI: 1.15-3.04, P = 0.01). Further, TT + CC genotype at TaqI(rs731236) was associated with a 1.33-fold higher risk of caries development than the TC genotype (OR = 1.33, 95%CI: 1.06-1.67, P = 0.02). On subgroup analysis, the association between TaqI(rs731236) and caries risk was affected by dentition type, and ethnicity (permanent dentition: OR = 1.48, 95%CI: 1.07-2.03, P = 0.02; Asian: OR = 1.38, 95%CI: 1.02-1.87, P = 0.03;). Genotype distributions at BsmI(rs1544410), TaqI/BglI(rs739837), FokI(rs2228570), and ApaI(rs7975232) did not differ significantly between the caries and caries-free groups. CONCLUSIONS: Caries risk could be associated with TaqI(rs731236) and FokI(rs10735810) genotypes, and TaqI(rs731236) may be a risk factor for permanent teeth caries among Asian people.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.837
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0120.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC PediatricsSame topicVitamin D Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207