MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403301260 · doi:10.1002/tax.13264

Molecular systematics of <i>Cuscuta</i> subgenus <i>Monogynella</i> (Convolvulaceae) based on plastid and nuclear sequences

2024· article· en· W4403301260 on OpenAlexafffund
Asawari Albal, Mihai Costea, Saša Stefanović

Bibliographic record

VenueTaxon · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Parasitism and Resistance
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier UniversityUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaRussian Academy of SciencesKomarov Botanical Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences
KeywordsCuscutaConvolvulaceaeSubgenusBotanySystematicsPlastidBiologyTaxonomy (biology)Genetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Cuscuta (dodders) consists of ~200 species circumscribed into four subgenera ( C. subg. Cuscuta , subg. Grammica , subg. Monogynella , subg. Pachystigma ) and is the only parasitic genus in Convolvulaceae (the morning‐glory family). This genus shows a significant diversity in plastid functionality and represents a rare mixotrophic system within parasitic plants, where different trophic modes can be found at a lower phylogenetic level. Cuscuta subg. Monogynella contains chlorophyllous hemiparasitic species distributed primarily across Eurasia, with Central Asia as its center of diversity. Apart from a few placeholders in broad‐scale phylogenies, this group has not been extensively sampled and studied taxonomically, morphologically, or geographically. Our paper presents the first in‐depth phylogeny for C. subg. Monogynella based on plastid trnL‐F and nuclear ITS sequence regions. Our wide taxon sampling included 12 out of the 15 presently recognized species, with specimens from across their geographic distribution. Our analyses show highly congruent trees, forming similar clades using both plastid and nuclear markers, with no indication of hybridization. Most of the species, represented by multiple individuals from various geographic regions, have been found reciprocally monophyletic or paraphyletic. One individual from south‐west China formed its own separate lineage, with substantial branch length subtending it, and given its distinct geographic distribution, likely belongs to a new species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.621
Threshold uncertainty score0.183

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTaxonSame topicPlant Parasitism and ResistanceFrench-language works237,207