MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403304542 · doi:10.1177/03611981241275580

Real-Time Monitoring and Forecasting Ice Layer Thickness Growth Rate and Grip Loss on a Road Network During Winter Storm Events

2024· article· en· W4403304542 on OpenAlexaff
Sepideh Emami Tabrizi, Marjo Hippi, James Sullivan, Hani Farghaly, Bahram Gharabaghi

Bibliographic record

VenueTransportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSmart Materials for Construction
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWinter stormStormEnvironmental scienceMeteorologyClimatologyGeologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Winter storm severity, road surface conditions, traffic volume, and vehicle speed can influence the risk of winter-related vehicular crashes. The severity of a winter storm depends on many climatic factors, including precipitation type, intensity and duration of the storm, wind speed, air temperature, and pavement surface temperature. The rapid growth of snow and ice layer thicknesses on the road surface significantly reduce the grip between tires and the road surface, leading to hazardous travel conditions. Our investigation shows that vehicular crash rates in winter months have an inverse linear relationship with the 10th percentile grip statistics, which is a function of how quickly the road was plowed and salted and the bare pavement conditions regained. We found a logarithmic relationship between the ice and snow layer thicknesses and the grip loss. We developed a new model for forecasting ice layer thickness growth rate as a function of the relative humidity, dewpoint temperature, and pavement temperature. Real-time monitoring and forecasting the spatial and temporal variability of the grip on a road network can help road authorities to better optimize the salt application strategy for a given winter storm event and prioritize the timing and frequency for the deployment of their fleet of winter maintenance vehicles on different salt routes to minimize vehicular crash rates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research BoardSame topicSmart Materials for ConstructionFrench-language works237,207