Epididymo-Orchitis Mimicking Malignancy Resulting From Intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guerin Immunotherapy for Bladder Cancer: An Attempt to Understand Pathophysiology, Diagnostic Challenges, Patients’ Implications and Future Directions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This case report describes an 85-year-old patient who presented with painless, unilateral right testicular swelling of 2 months' duration. This raised the possibility of testicular cancer, especially given his recent treatment for bladder cancer, which included adjuvant intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) therapy. This poses a diagnostic dilemma regarding tuberculosis (TB) of the testis, BCG complications or a true testicular malignancy. Biochemical markers and a computed tomography (CT) scan showed no evidence of malignancy or disseminated TB. A TB-ELISpot test was negative. An ultrasound of the testis revealed a hypoechoic soft tissue lesion measuring approximately 24 ¡Á 19 mm, with internal vascularity and calcifications, causing a bulge in the testicular capsule with probable extracapsular extension. Based on the clinical suspicion of a testicular tumor, a right inguinal orchidectomy was performed. Histopathologic examination revealed isolated tuberculous orchitis with focal epididymal involvement; the spermatic cord was not involved. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing on the histological sample confirmed the presence of Mycobacterium bovis DNA. As a radical right orchidectomy had been performed, no abnormal tissue remained. Additionally, the CT scan showed no evidence of TB dissemination, and the patient was asymptomatic, so he was being closely monitored in the infectious disease clinic. Importantly, a urine culture became positive for TB, and he was started on antituberculosis medication. BCG-induced granulomatous epididymo-orchitis may rarely occur as a late complication following intravesical BCG therapy for superficial bladder cancer. In this case report, we attempted to understand the pathophysiology, diagnostic challenges, patient implications, and potential future research directions. J Med Cases. 2024;15(11):354-358 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jmc4323
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".