MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403309963 · doi:10.14740/jmc4305

Rapid Resolution of Delayed Facial Palsy in Miller Fisher Syndrome With Steroid Therapy

2024· article· en· W4403309963 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Nithisha Thatikonda, Alexandru Lerint, Vijaya Lakshmi Valaparla, Chilvana Patel

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Cases · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPeripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMiller-Fisher syndromePalsyPediatricsAlternative medicineGuillain-Barre syndromePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Miller Fisher syndrome (MFS), a variant of Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS), is characterized by the classic triad of ataxia, areflexia, and ophthalmoplegia. Approximately 20% of MFS patients experience facial weakness, with a subset developing delayed facial palsy (DFP) after other neurological symptoms have peaked or begun to improve. Initially, DFP was considered a natural progression of MFS, leading to recommendations against additional treatment. However, DFP persisted for more than 50 days without additional treatment in some patients, prompting additional steroid therapy, resulting in quicker resolution of DFP. We describe an MFS patient who presented with the classic triad of MFS and subsequently developed DFP. The patient was treated with methylprednisolone pulse therapy (1,000 mg/day for 3 days) followed by oral prednisolone (60 mg/day) with a gradual taper, resulting in rapid and complete resolution of DFP, suggesting an alternative mechanism behind DFP, opening avenues for further research and insights into this matter. MFS-DFP is rarely reported in the literature. In addition to this case, we aim to provide a comprehensive literature review on MFS-DFP, to further expand the existing knowledge on the current concepts of DFP-MFS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.511
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical CasesSame topicPeripheral Neuropathies and DisordersFrench-language works237,207