MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403325076 · doi:10.5430/jst.v14n1p31

Comparison of 35 trace elements content in malignant breast tumors with their content in the normal female mammary gland: Original data and a mini-review

2024· article· en· W4403325076 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Vladimir Zaichick, Д. Н. Догадкин, I. N. Gromyak, D. V. Tyurin, В. П. Колотов

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Solid Tumors · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicTrace Elements in Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersRussian Academy of SciencesMinistry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation
KeywordsContent (measure theory)TRACE (psycholinguistics)Mammary glandMedicinePathologyPhysiologyInternal medicineBreast cancerMathematicsCancerPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: In many countries, including Russia, breast cancer ranks first in the incidence of cancers in women. The etiology of this disease remains largely unclear, but there is evidence indicating that disturbances in the somatic homeostasis of trace elements may be involved in the process of oncogenesis. Therefore, this study was aimed at identifying changes in the content of trace elements during malignant transformation of breast tissue.Methods: For this purpose, an effective method of small sample analysis by means of inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry was developed. The method makes it possible to determine the content of 35 trace elements in microsamples (with mass ≥ 10 mg) of breast tissue obtained by puncture biopsy. With the help of this technique, the samples of cancerous (n = 43) and normal (n = 38) breast tissue were studied.Results: In malignant breast tissue, the content of Al, As, B, Cd, Co, Cs, Cu, Mg, Mn, Mo, Ni, Rb, Se, Sr, Ti, Tl, U, V, Zn, and Zr was higher, while the content of Ge, Pb, Sb and Th was lower than in healthy gland tissue. All the identified differences were statistically significant.Conclusions: The significant disruption of somatic homeostasis of trace elements resulting from malignant transformation of breast tissue has been described, but its cause has not been determined, so additional research is required. Further the method we employ, which we have developed and described here, requires tissue samples weighing only a few milligrams, so it is possible to use it with tissue obtained from puncture tissue biopsies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.098
Threshold uncertainty score0.654

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.105
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Solid TumorsSame topicTrace Elements in HealthFrench-language works237,207