Effectiveness of a Person-Centered Interdisciplinary Rehabilitation Treatment of Post–COVID-19 Condition: Protocol for a Single-Case Experimental Design Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with post-COVID-19 condition (PCC) experience a wide range of complaints (physical, cognitive, and mental), sometimes with high levels of disability in daily activities. Evidence of effective interdisciplinary rehabilitation treatment is lacking. A person-centered, biopsychosocial, interdisciplinary rehabilitation program, adapted to expert opinions and the patient's needs, was therefore developed. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to present a study protocol for a clinical trial to evaluate the effect of a new, person-centered, interdisciplinary rehabilitation treatment for PCC. It is aimed at improving participation in society and health-related quality of life in patients with PCC who perceive a high level of disability in daily activities or participation. METHODS: A total of 20 Dutch adults, aged 18 years or older, with high levels of disability in daily activities and participation in society will be included in this replicated and randomized single-case experimental design study, from October 2023 onward. The replicated and randomized single-case experimental design consists of 3 phases. The baseline phase is the observational period, in which no specific treatment will be given. In the intervention phase, patients will receive the new outpatient treatment 3 times a week for 12 weeks, followed by a 12-week follow-up phase. During the intervention phase, the treatment will be personalized according to the patient's physical, mental, and cognitive symptoms and goals. The treatment team can consist of a rehabilitation physician, physiotherapist, occupational therapist, speech therapist, and psychologist. The primary outcomes of the study are daily diaries, which consist of 8 questions selected from validated questionnaires (Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation, EQ-5D-5L, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale). The other primary outcome measurements are participation in society (Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation) and health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L). The secondary outcomes are physical tests and validated questionnaires aimed at physical, mental, and cognitive complaints. Effect evaluation based on daily assessments will include visual analysis, calculation of effect sizes (Nonoverlap of All Pairs), randomization tests, and multilevel analysis. In addition, other analyses will be based on ANOVA or a 2-tailed Student t test. RESULTS: Data collection for this study started in October 2023 and is planned to be completed in July 2024. The results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at international conferences. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study investigating the effect of an interdisciplinary rehabilitation treatment with a person-centered, biopsychosocial approach in patients with PCC. Our findings will help to improve the treatment and support of patients with PCC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00032636; https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00032636. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/63951.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.058 | 0.038 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.010 | 0.006 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.010 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.041 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".