MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403332493 · doi:10.1016/j.ces.2024.120822

Molecular simulation of gas entrapment near a nanoscale cavity: The interplay of surface wettability, cavity shape, and gas type

2024· article· en· W4403332493 on OpenAlexafffund
Ali Ghamartale, Peichun Amy Tsai, Tian Tang

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Engineering Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSurface Modification and Superhydrophobicity
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsEntrapmentWettingNanoscopic scaleMaterials scienceMolecular dynamicsSurface (topology)Chemical engineeringComposite materialNanotechnologyChemistryGeometryEngineeringComputational chemistryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Methylated square-shaped cavity enables stable nanobubble entrapment for both CO 2 and N 2 . • N 2 and CO 2 adsorb differently (nanobubble vs. monolayer) on hydroxylated surface. • Gas solubility and configuration near surface are key to the entrapment mode. • V-shaped cavity lacks the ability to trap nanobubbles. Surface cavities play a crucial role in trapping and stabilizing gases, a phenomenon that can be used to facilitate applications in separation and drying processes. Understanding surface characteristics in relation to fluid-surface interactions is essential for designing interfacial properties that enable effective processes. In this work, we adopt a molecular simulation approach to investigate gas adsorption and entrapment in surface defects (cavities), focusing on the influence of surface wettability, cavity shape, and gas type. For this purpose, two types of silica-based surfaces with different levels of wettability (methylated and hydroxylated, with the former having lower water wettability), two cavity shapes with identical opening width and depth (V-shaped and square-shaped), and two types of gas (carbon dioxide and nitrogen) are considered. Our observations indicate that a stable gas nanobubble forms when a methylated surface combines with a square-shaped cavity, regardless of the gas type. In contrast, for hydroxylated surface, gas type becomes important; in a square-shaped cavity, nitrogen forms a stable nanobubble while CO 2 is trapped in a monolayer fashion. The interfacial forces between the gas and surface which affects gas configuration near the surface, along with the gas molecules’ self-interaction manifested by solubility, are key to the different entrapment modes for N 2 and CO 2 . Moreover, the square-shaped cavity exhibits better capability in trapping gas compared to the V-shaped cavity due to its higher surface area and smaller opening-to-interior ratio. The results of our molecular simulations can guide the design of surface features and processing systems to modify gas entrapment modes and stabilize nanoscale gas bubbles without altering thermodynamic conditions or fluid properties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.342
Threshold uncertainty score0.302

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemical Engineering ScienceSame topicSurface Modification and SuperhydrophobicityFrench-language works237,207