MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403332825 · doi:10.1145/3686490.3686519

MPSleepNet: Matrix Profile-Guided Transformer for Multi-Channel Sleep Classification

2024· article· en· W4403332825 on OpenAlexaff
Huanjing Liu, Camilo E. Valderrama, Xingying Zhang, Qian Liu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlind Source Separation Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaUniversity of Winnipeg
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceTransformerElectronic engineeringPattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceElectrical engineeringEngineeringVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Polysomnography (PSG)-based sleep staging is vital for assessing sleep quality. As a state-of-the-art deep learning model structure, Transformer has been increasingly utilized to enhance sleep stage classification efficiency. However, the default self-attention mechanism in Transformer encoder often struggles with long-term dependencies in time sequences. To overcome this limitation, we introduce a novel method that integrates the Matrix Profile, a time series data mining technique, with the Transformer's self-attention mechanism to better capture global data abnormalities and temporal dynamics. Our approach preprocesses PSG data from multiple channels using Matrix Profiles to highlight significant patterns. These profiles, combined with time-frequency representations, are fed into a Transformer encoder to fuse multi-channel features, and enhance the understanding of temporal interdependencies. The enhanced features are classified via two fully connected layers, yielding substantial improvements in sleep stage classification accuracy and efficiency on multichannel data as compared to the baseline models. This work not only underscores the efficacy of Matrix Profile in sleep classification but also proposes a new paradigm for processing complex temporal data in deep learning models. The complete code for this model is available at https://github.com/EliteriaLYU/MPSleepNet.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.930
Threshold uncertainty score0.493

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBlind Source Separation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207