MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403335222 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.075008

Electric dipole moments as probes of the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>R</mml:mi> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>D</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mo>*</mml:mo> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:msub> </mml:math> anomaly

2024· article· lv· W4403335222 on OpenAlexaff
Syuhei Iguro, Teppei Kitahara

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D. · 2024
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Subatomic Physics Research
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Particle Physics
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceUniversitat de BarcelonaMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceAlgorithmPhysicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The measurements of the lepton flavor universality (LFU) in <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <a:mrow> <a:mi mathvariant="script">B</a:mi> <a:mo stretchy="false">(</a:mo> <a:mrow> <a:mover accent="true"> <a:mrow> <a:mi>B</a:mi> </a:mrow> <a:mrow> <a:mo stretchy="false">¯</a:mo> </a:mrow> </a:mover> </a:mrow> <a:mo stretchy="false">→</a:mo> <a:msup> <a:mrow> <a:mi>D</a:mi> </a:mrow> <a:mrow> <a:mo stretchy="false">(</a:mo> <a:mo>*</a:mo> <a:mo stretchy="false">)</a:mo> </a:mrow> </a:msup> <a:mi>l</a:mi> <a:mover accent="true"> <a:mrow> <a:mi>ν</a:mi> </a:mrow> <a:mrow> <a:mo stretchy="false">¯</a:mo> </a:mrow> </a:mover> <a:mo stretchy="false">)</a:mo> </a:mrow> </a:math> indicate a significant deviation from the standard model prediction at a <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <m:mrow> <m:mn>3</m:mn> <m:mi>–</m:mi> <m:mn>4</m:mn> <m:mi>σ</m:mi> </m:mrow> </m:math> level, revealing a violation of the LFU ( <o:math xmlns:o="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <o:msub> <o:mi>R</o:mi> <o:msup> <o:mi>D</o:mi> <o:mrow> <o:mo stretchy="false">(</o:mo> <o:mo>*</o:mo> <o:mo stretchy="false">)</o:mo> </o:mrow> </o:msup> </o:msub> </o:math> anomaly). It is known that the <s:math xmlns:s="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <s:msub> <s:mi>R</s:mi> <s:msup> <s:mi>D</s:mi> <s:mrow> <s:mo stretchy="false">(</s:mo> <s:mo>*</s:mo> <s:mo stretchy="false">)</s:mo> </s:mrow> </s:msup> </s:msub> </s:math> anomaly can be easily accommodated by an <w:math xmlns:w="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <w:mi>S</w:mi> <w:mi>U</w:mi> <w:mo stretchy="false">(</w:mo> <w:mn>2</w:mn> <w:msub> <w:mo stretchy="false">)</w:mo> <w:mi>L</w:mi> </w:msub> </w:math> -singlet vector leptoquark (LQ) coupled primarily to third-generation fermions, whose existence is further motivated by a partial gauge unification. In general, such a LQ naturally leads to additional <ab:math xmlns:ab="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <ab:mi>C</ab:mi> <ab:mi>P</ab:mi> </ab:math> -violating phases in the LQ interactions. In this paper, we point out that the current <cb:math xmlns:cb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <cb:msub> <cb:mi>R</cb:mi> <cb:msup> <cb:mi>D</cb:mi> <cb:mrow> <cb:mo stretchy="false">(</cb:mo> <cb:mo>*</cb:mo> <cb:mo stretchy="false">)</cb:mo> </cb:mrow> </cb:msup> </cb:msub> </cb:math> anomaly prefers the <gb:math xmlns:gb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <gb:mi>C</gb:mi> <gb:mi>P</gb:mi> </gb:math> -violating interaction although <ib:math xmlns:ib="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <ib:mrow> <ib:mi mathvariant="script">B</ib:mi> <ib:mo stretchy="false">(</ib:mo> <ib:mrow> <ib:mover accent="true"> <ib:mrow> <ib:mi>B</ib:mi> </ib:mrow> <ib:mrow> <ib:mo stretchy="false">¯</ib:mo> </ib:mrow> </ib:mover> </ib:mrow> <ib:mo stretchy="false">→</ib:mo> <ib:msup> <ib:mrow> <ib:mi>D</ib:mi> </ib:mrow> <ib:mrow> <ib:mo stretchy="false">(</ib:mo> <ib:mo>*</ib:mo> <ib:mo stretchy="false">)</ib:mo> </ib:mrow> </ib:msup> <ib:mi>l</ib:mi> <ib:mover accent="true"> <ib:mrow> <ib:mi>ν</ib:mi> </ib:mrow> <ib:mrow> <ib:mo stretchy="false">¯</ib:mo> </ib:mrow> </ib:mover> <ib:mo stretchy="false">)</ib:mo> </ib:mrow> </ib:math> are <ub:math xmlns:ub="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <ub:mi>C</ub:mi> <ub:mi>P</ub:mi> </ub:math> -conserving observables. The <wb:math xmlns:wb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <wb:mi>C</wb:mi> <wb:mi>P</wb:mi> </wb:math> -violating LQ predicts a substantial size of the bottom-quark electric dipole moment (EDM), the chromo-EDM, and also the tau-lepton EDM. Eventually at low energy, the nucleon and electron EDMs are radiatively induced. Therefore, we conclude that the <yb:math xmlns:yb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <yb:msub> <yb:mi>R</yb:mi> <yb:msup> <yb:mi>D</yb:mi> <yb:mrow> <yb:mo stretchy="false">(</yb:mo> <yb:mo>*</yb:mo> <yb:mo stretchy="false">)</yb:mo> </yb:mrow> </yb:msup> </yb:msub> </yb:math> anomaly with the <cc:math xmlns:cc="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <cc:mi>S</cc:mi> <cc:mi>U</cc:mi> <cc:mo stretchy="false">(</cc:mo> <cc:mn>2</cc:mn> <cc:msub> <cc:mo stretchy="false">)</cc:mo> <cc:mi>L</cc:mi> </cc:msub> </cc:math> -singlet vector LQ provides unique predictions: neutron and proton EDMs with opposite signs and a magnitude of <gc:math xmlns:gc="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <gc:mrow> <gc:mi mathvariant="script">O</gc:mi> <gc:mo stretchy="false">(</gc:mo> <gc:msup> <gc:mrow> <gc:mn>10</gc:mn> </gc:mrow> <gc:mrow> <gc:mo>−</gc:mo> <gc:mn>27</gc:mn> </gc:mrow> </gc:msup> <gc:mo stretchy="false">)</gc:mo> <gc:mtext> </gc:mtext> <gc:mtext> </gc:mtext> <gc:mi>e</gc:mi> <gc:mtext> </gc:mtext> <gc:mi>cm</gc:mi> </gc:mrow> </gc:math> , and suppressed electron EDM. Furthermore, we show that a similar EDM pattern is predicted in an <lc:math xmlns:lc="h

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.849
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.007
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0050.004
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D.Same topicAtomic and Subatomic Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207