MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4403335921 · doi:10.1099/acmi.0.000932.v1

<xhtml:span xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en">Anaerobic HgII reduction is driven by cellular HgII-thiol interactions</xhtml:span>

2024· preprint· en· W4403335921 on OpenAlexaff
Noémie C. Lavoie, Alexandre J. Poulain

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMercury impact and mitigation studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsXHTMLXMLMarkup languageComputer scienceWorld Wide WebChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Redox reactions determine the availability of mercury species, HgII and Hg0, to anaerobic microbes responsible for the methylation of inorganic Hg into toxic methylmercury. Certain anaerobes also play an important role in Hg cycling in methylation hot spots by reducing HgII to its gaseous elemental form Hg0, yet their contributions remain unquantified due to a paucity of mechanistic information or genetic targets. In this work, we sought to uncover further mechanistic details on anaerobic HgII reduction by the versatile anoxygenic photoheterotroph and fermenter Heliomicrobium modesticaldumIce1. Due to HgII’s electrophilic attraction to thiols, we hypothesized that cellular thiol groups are likely interaction sites involved in HgII reduction. We exposed H. modesticaldum to the thiol-alkylating agent N-ethylmaleimide to irreversibly bind to thiols and found a concentration-dependent inhibition of Hg0 production during anoxygenic photoheterotrophy and fermentation. We propose updated insights into Heliobacterial HgII reduction where HgII-thiol interactions are a key step of the mechanism and discuss potential enzymatic coupling sites that merit further investigation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.210
Threshold uncertainty score0.701

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2100.123

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMercury impact and mitigation studies→French-language works237,207→