MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403339404 · doi:10.1080/17425255.2024.2416046

Pharmacokinetic evaluation of fezolinetant for the treatment of vasomotor symptoms caused by menopause

2024· review· en· W4403339404 on OpenAlexaff
Laura Cucinella, Sara Tedeschi, Stefano Memoli, Chiara Cassani, Ellis Martini, Rossella E. Nappi

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMenopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity Hospital Foundation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMenopauseVasomotorMedicinePharmacokineticsInternal medicineIntensive care medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Vasomotor symptoms (VMS) affect the majority of menopausal women, with possible negative impact on several domains of quality of life (QoL). Although menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) represents an effective treatment, the risk-benefit profile is not favorable for every woman. Non-hormonal options are limited in number and efficacy. AREAS COVERED: Fezolinetant is a novel oral non-hormonal drug recently approved for the treatment of moderate-severe VMS. It acts as an antagonist of neurokinin 3 receptor (NK3R), the main target of neurokinin B (a tachykinin over-expressed by kisspeptin/neurokinin B/dynorphin [KNDy] neurons after menopausal hypoestrogenism), involved in the modulation of the thermoregulatory hypothalamic center. Here, we report pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetic properties of fezolinetant as well as its efficacy and safety data from available clinical trials. EXPERT OPINION: Fezolinetant has shown efficacy in reducing the frequency and severity of VMS with a positive impact on sleep- and health-related QoL and acceptable safety and tolerability profile. Given the limited availability of effective non-hormonal options for VMS, fezolinetant could potentially represent a game-changer for care of menopausal women, especially when relative or absolute contraindications to MHT use are present. Further studies to gain more information about the safety profile and potential extra-VMS benefits or disadvantages are warranted in real-life clinical practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.123
GPT teacher head0.464
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & ToxicologySame topicMenopause: Health Impacts and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207