MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Replacive IOCG systems in the Ossa Morena Zone (SW Iberia): The role of pre-existing ironstones as a geochemical trap

2024· article· en· W4403351530 on OpenAlexaff
Fernando Tornos, Carmen Conde, David Rodriguez, Dolores García, John M. Hanchar, Jesús García Nieto, Gonzalo Ares, Tobias Bauer, Luis Rodríguez Pevida

Bibliographic record

VenueOre Geology Reviews · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geophysical Studies Worldwide
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersHORIZON EUROPE Framework ProgrammeHorizon 2020 Framework Programme
KeywordsIron oxide copper gold ore depositsGeologyGeochemistryEarth sciencePaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The central Ossa Morena Zone (SW Iberia) hosts a regionally extensive ironstone level interbedded with bimodal volcanic rocks, limestone and shale of Lower-Middle Cambrian age. The stratabound ironstone includes dominant magnetite and hematite with locally abundant chert and barite. It is interpreted as being (sub-)exhalative at or near the seafloor and formed during a rifting event that postdated the Cadomian orogeny. In some places, such as in the Las Herrerías deposit, the ironstone is irregularly replaced by a chalcopyrite-rich ore; the Cu-rich mineralization is accompanied by the pervasive phyllic alteration of the hosting siliciclastic sediments. The highest copper grades are found when the ironstone is crosscut by WNW-ESE-trending late-Variscan extensional brittle-ductile structures that are interpreted as the feeder channels for deep hydrothermal fluids. A similar nearby copper-rich mineralization (Pallares) is likely controlled by the tectonic contact between limestone and pyrite-rich black shale. Sr-Nd whole-rock isotope geochemistry data suggests that the Sr in the ironstone (87Sr/86Sri ≈ 0.7088) is close to isotopic equilibrium with the local exhalative barite (0.7084–0.7086) and Cambrian seawater. The ironstone has a significantly more crustal εNd initial signature (<-1.8) than the coeval volcanic rocks (+5.2 to + 7.9). The younger sulfide mineralization inherited the Nd isotope composition of the ironstone but shows a significant enrichment in 87Sr (87Sr/86Sr > 0.7091) that is interpreted as related with the input of genetically different and more crustally-derived hydrothermal fluids. 39Ar-40Ar dating of the phyllic alteration suggest that the copper mineralization was formed at ca. 332–330 My. These ages are coeval with those of small peraluminous granite intrusions that host Cu-Au vein-like mineralization and dated at 331.8 ± 1.6 Ma (LA ICPMS U-Pb zircon). Our interpretation is that the copper-rich mineralization at the Las Herrerías area is the distal expression of an intrusion-related hydrothermal system. Numerical modelling shows that ironstone is an effective trap for copper precipitation due to the large changes in pH and fO2 that take place when copper-bearing acid and reduced fluids react with the brittle ironstone. The precipitation of chalcopyrite, however, is controlled by the amount of available reduced sulfur in the ore trap. The δ34S values of the sulfides (+12.6 to + 21.6 ‰) suggest that the most likely source for the reduced sulfur is the thermogenic reduction of aqueous sulfate equilibrated with the exhalative barite (δ34S, +31.4 to + 35 ‰) with some minor input of reduced sulfur leached from the metasediments. This system could be considered as a variant of the IOCG clan. The formation of the ironstone and the copper mineralization, however, are separated by more than 200 My. Probably, many IOCG systems have a similar origin as Las Herrerías, with an ironstone being just a passive geochemical trap for the copper–gold mineralization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.208
Threshold uncertainty score0.414

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOre Geology ReviewsSame topicGeological and Geophysical Studies WorldwideFrench-language works237,207