Does 18 Hz deep TMS benefit a different subgroup of depressed patients relative to 10 Hz rTMS? The role of the individual alpha frequency
Bibliographic record
Abstract
• Individual alpha frequency represents a robust EEG biomarker in depression. • Depression patients with a 9 Hz alpha rhythm show worse response to 18 Hz deep TMS. • Alpha frequency-based biomarker can stratify patients to 3 different TMS protocols. • Endogenous oscillations at 9 Hz might not get entrained by 18 Hz harmonic frequency. Both 10 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) as well as 18 Hz deep TMS (dTMS) constitute effective, FDA-approved TMS treatment protocols for depression. However, not all patients experience sufficient symptom relief after either of these protocols. Biomarker-guided treatment stratification could aid in personalizing treatment and thereby enhancing improvement. An individual alpha frequency (iAF)-based EEG-biomarker, Brainmarker-I, can differentially stratify patients to depression treatments. For instance, an iAF close to 10 Hz was associated with better improvement to 10 Hz rTMS, possibly reflecting entrainment of endogenous oscillations to the stimulation frequency. Accordingly, we examined whether 18 Hz dTMS would result in better improvement in individuals whose iAF lies around 9 Hz, a harmonic frequency of 18 Hz. Curve fitting and regression analyses were conducted to assess the relation between iAF and improvement. For treatment stratification purposes, correlations with iAF-distance to 10 Hz compared 18 Hz dTMS ( N = 114) to 10 Hz rTMS ( N = 72). We found a robust quadratic effect, indicating that patients with an iAF around 9 Hz exhibited least symptom improvement (r 2 =0.126, p <.001). Improvement correlated positively with iAF-distance to 10 Hz ( p =.003). A secondary analysis in 20 Hz figure-of-eight data confirmed this direction. A significant interaction of iAF-distance and stimulation frequency between 10 and 18 Hz datasets emerged ( p =.026). These results question entrainment of endogenous oscillations by their harmonic frequency for 18 Hz, and suggest that 10 Hz and 18 Hz TMS target different subgroups of depression patients. This study adds to iAF stratification, augmenting Brainmarker-I with alternative TMS protocols (18 Hz/20 Hz) for patients with a slower iAF, thereby broadening clinical applicability and relevance of the biomarker.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".