MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403363723 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.032002

Low-threshold response of a scintillating xenon bubble chamber to nuclear and electronic recoils

2025· preprint· en· W4403363723 on OpenAlexafffund
E. Alfonso-Pita, E. Behnke, M. Bressler, B. Broerman, K. Clark, R. Coppejans, Jonathan Corbett, M. B. Crisler, C. E. Dahl, K. Dering, A. De St. Croix, Daniel Durnford, P. Giampa, Jonathan Μ. Hall, O. Harris, H. Hawley-Herrera, N. Lamb, M. Laurin, I. Levine, W. H. Lippincott, R. Neilson, M. -C. Piro, Daniel Pyda, Z. Sheng, G. G. Sweeney, E. Vázquez-Jáuregui, S. Westerdale, T. J. Whitis, A. Wright, J. Zhang, R. Zhang, A. Zuñiga-Reyes

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D. · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRadiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversity of AlbertaQueen's University
FundersDivision of Materials ResearchDirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlliance de recherche numérique du CanadaOffice of ScienceCanada First Research Excellence FundWestern Canada Research GridNational Science FoundationCompute CanadaU.S. Department of EnergyFundación Marcos MoshinskyConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología
KeywordsBubble chamberRecoilPhysicsBubbleXenonScintillationNuclear physicsNucleationSensitivity (control systems)AugerAtomic physicsDetectorOpticsMechanicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A device filled with pure xenon first demonstrated the ability to operate simultaneously as a bubble chamber and scintillation detector in 2017. Initial results from data taken at thermodynamic thresholds down to $\ensuremath{\sim}4\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{keV}$ showed sensitivity to $\ensuremath{\sim}20\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{keV}$ nuclear recoils with no observable bubble nucleation by $\ensuremath{\gamma}$-ray interactions. This paper presents results from further operation of the same device at thermodynamic thresholds as low as 0.50 keV, hardware limited. The bubble chamber has now been shown to have sensitivity to $\ensuremath{\sim}1\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{keV}$ nuclear recoils while remaining insensitive to bubble nucleation by $\ensuremath{\gamma}$-rays. A data-driven calibration of the chamber's nuclear recoil nucleation response, as a function of nuclear recoil energy and thermodynamic state, is presented. Stringent upper limits are established for the probability of bubble nucleation by $\ensuremath{\gamma}$-ray-induced Auger cascades, with a limit of $<1.1\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}6}$ set at 0.50 keV, the lowest thermodynamic threshold explored.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.376 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D.Same topicRadiation Detection and Scintillator TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207