MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403370795 · doi:10.1111/bcpt.14092

Efficacy of weekly <i>versus</i> daily cholecalciferol for repleting serum vitamin D (25(OH)D) deficiency: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials

2024· review· en· W4403370795 on OpenAlexaff
Émilie Bortolussi‐Courval, Connor Prosty, Jimin J. Lee, Lisa McCarthy, Emily G. McDonald, Todd C. Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueBasic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVitamin D Research Studies
Canadian institutionsTrillium Health CentreUniversity of TorontoMcGill University Health CentreMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCholecalciferolMedicineVitamin D and neurologyvitamin D deficiencyMeta-analysisDosingInternal medicineHypovitaminosisRandomized controlled trialGastroenterology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OpenAlex records an abstract for this work, but it could not be fetched just now.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.076
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.143
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.456
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0760.143
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.1360.035
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.241
GPT teacher head0.536
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBasic & Clinical Pharmacology & ToxicologySame topicVitamin D Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207