Parallel Spectral Tuning of a Cone Visual Pigment Provides Evidence for Ancient Deep-Sea Adaptations in Cetaceans
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dichromatic color vision is mediated by two cone visual pigments in many eutherian mammals. After reentry into the sea, early cetaceans lost their violet-sensitive visual pigment (short wavelength-sensitive 1) independently in the baleen and toothed whale ancestors and thus obtained only monochromatic cone vision. Subsequently, losses of the middle/long wavelength-sensitive (M/LWS) pigment have also been reported in multiple whale lineages, leading to rhodopsin (RH1)-mediated rod monochromatic vision. To further elucidate the phenotypic evolution of whale visual pigments, we assessed the spectral tuning of both M/LWS and RH1 from representative cetacean taxa. Interestingly, although the coding sequences for M/LWS are intact in both the pygmy right whale and the Baird's beaked whale, no spectral sensitivity was detected in vitro. Pseudogenization of other cone vision-related genes is observed in the pygmy right whale, suggesting a loss of cone-mediated vision. After ancestral sequence reconstructions, ancient M/LWS pigments from cetacean ancestors were resurrected and functionally measured. Spectral tuning of M/LWS from the baleen whale ancestor shows that it is green sensitive, with a 40-nm shift in sensitivity to a shorter wavelength. For the ancestor of sperm whales, although no spectral sensitivity could be recorded for its M/LWS pigment, a substantial sensitivity shift (20 to 30 nm) to a shorter wavelength may have also occurred before its functional inactivation. The parallel phenotypic evolution of M/LWS to shorter wavelength sensitivity might be visual adaptations in whales allowing more frequent deep-sea activities, although additional ecological differentiations may have led to their subsequent losses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".