Multi-Layer Dense Attention Decoder for Polyp Segmentation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Detecting and segmenting polyps is crucial for expediting the diagnosis of colon cancer. This is a challenging task due to the large variations of polyps in color, texture, and lighting conditions, along with subtle differences between the polyp and its surrounding area. Recently, vision Transformers have shown robust abilities in modeling global context for polyp segmentation. However, they face two major limitations: the inability to learn local relations among multi-level layers and inadequate feature aggregation in the decoder. To address these issues, we propose a novel decoder architecture aimed at hierarchically aggregating locally enhanced multi-level dense features. Specifically, we introduce a novel module named Dense Attention Gate (DAG), which adaptively fuses all previous layers’ features to establish local feature relations among all layers. Furthermore, we propose a novel nested decoder architecture that hierarchically aggregates decoder features, thereby enhancing semantic features. We incorporate our novel dense decoder with the PVT backbone network and conduct evaluations on five polyp segmentation datasets: Kvasir, CVC-300, CVC-ColonDB, CVC-ClinicDB, and ETIS. Our experiments and comparisons with nine competing segmentation models demonstrate that the proposed architecture achieves state-of-the-art performance and outperforms the previous models on four datasets. The source code is available at: https://github.com/krushi1992/Dense-Decoder.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".