MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403386390 · doi:10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101530

Dissecting causal relationships between immune cells, blood metabolites, and aortic dissection: A mediation Mendelian randomization study

2024· article· en· W4403386390 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ao Li, ZiAn Feng, Sha Fu, Zhi Ma, Haiyang Zhang, Zhiwei Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueIJC Heart & Vasculature · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic Associations and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMendelian randomizationAortic dissectionMedicineMediationImmune systemRandomizationCausal inferenceInternal medicineClinical trialImmunologyGeneGeneticsAortaBiologyPathologyGenetic variants

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: There exists a robust correlation between the infiltration of immune cells and the pathogenesis of aortic dissection (AD). Moreover, blood metabolites serve as immunomodulatory agents within the organism, influencing the immune system's response and potentially playing a role in the development of AD. Nevertheless, the intricate genetic causal nexus between specific immune cells, blood metabolites, and AD remains partially elucidated. Objectives: This study aims to elucidate the causal relationships between specific immune cell types and the risk of developing AD, mediated by blood metabolites, using Mendelian Randomization (MR) methods. Methods: We undertook a comprehensive investigation of 731 immune cell types through the analysis of published genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Our methodology hinged on the application of two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) and mediator MR analyses, prioritizing blood metabolites as potential intermediary factors and AD as the principal outcome of interest. The primary statistical method employed was inverse variance-weighted estimation, complemented by a variety of sensitivity analyses to reinforce our conclusions. The entirety of our statistical analyses was executed on the R software platform. Results: Our analyses elucidated that three immune cell types exhibited a positive correlation with the incidence of AD, whereas two immune cell types were inversely associated with AD risk. Significantly, our mediation Mendelian randomization (MR) findings identified Benzoate as a pivotal mediator in the influence of CD19 on IgD - CD38br cells on AD, with a mediation proportion of 5.38 %. Additionally, N-acetylproline was determined to mediate the effect of CD24 on IgD- CD38- cells on AD, accounting for a mediation proportion of 13.70 %. Furthermore, Carnitine C5:1 was found to mediate the effect of CD28 on secreting T regulatory (Treg) cells on AD, with a mediation proportion of 17.80 %. Conclusions: These findings offer a nuanced understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying AD, thereby advancing the precision medicine paradigm in the clinical management of AD.Abbreviations: AD: aortic dissection; AA: aortic aneurysm; GWAS: genome-wide association study; MR: Mendelian randomization; TSMR: two-step Mendelian randomization; Treg: secreting T regulatory cell; VSMC: vascular smooth muscle cell; MMP: matrix metalloproteinase; ROS: reactive oxygen species; IV: instrumental variable; SNP: single-nucleotide polymorphism; IVW: inverse variance weighted; LDSC: linkage disequilibrium score regression; OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; LD: linkage disequilibrium; AC: absolute cell; MFI: median fluorescence intensity; MP: morphological parameter; RC: relative cell; CLSA: Canadian Longitudinal Study of Aging; Lp(a): Lipoprotein a; OxPL: oxidised phospholipid; NMDAR: N-methyl-d-aspartate glutamate receptor; STROBE-MR: Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology using Mendelian Randomization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.220
Threshold uncertainty score0.727

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIJC Heart & VasculatureSame topicGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207