MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403400873 · doi:10.1038/s41408-024-01159-8

Patterns of progression in a contemporary cohort of 447 patients with smoldering multiple myeloma

2024· letter· en· W4403400873 on OpenAlexaff
Annika Werly, Mareike Hampel, Thomas Hielscher, Kosima Zuern, Alissa Visram, Marc S. Raab, Carsten Müller‐Tidow, Hartmut Goldschmidt, K. Elias

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood Cancer Journal · 2024
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsOttawa Hospital
FundersUniversitätsklinikum HeidelbergDeutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
KeywordsMultiple myelomaCohortMedicineInternal medicineOncology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) is considered an asymptomatic plasma cell disorder preceding multiple myeloma (MM). The course of SMM disease is heterogenous, largely driven by disease biology and tumor burden [ 1 , 2 ]. Routine clinical surveillance or early treatment, mostly within clinical trials, is thus based on the likelihood of developing a myeloma defining event (MDE) requiring systemic treatment [ 3 ]. Current stratification models for risk of progression include bone marrow plasma cell (BMPC) infiltration, monoclonal (M) protein component, ratio of involved/uninvolved serum free light chains (FLCr), and cytogenetic abnormalities [ 4 , 5 ]. Early systemic treatment of high-risk SMM has shown to improve progression free survival in two trials and overall survival (OS) in one of them [ 6 , 7 ]. However, early treatment of SMM is not considered a standard of care [ 8 , 9 ].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood Cancer JournalSame topicMultiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207