MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403411496 · doi:10.1007/s40475-024-00331-1

A Malaria-Free World? Bring Back Public Health Entomologists

2024· article· en· W4403411496 on OpenAlexaff
Manuel Lluberas, Bruce M. Kramer

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Tropical Medicine Reports · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMosquito-borne diseases and control
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMalariaPublic healthEntomologyTropical medicineMedicineGeographyEnvironmental healthBiologyNursingEcologyImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Malaria incidence and mortality rates continue to rise due to many interconnected factors. Current efforts to dampen this increase include innovative interventions such as a trial of the RTS, S malaria vaccine in Africa, using dual insecticides to impregnate mosquito nets, and the release of Wolbachia -infected Anopheles mosquitoes, malaria’s vector. The present review focuses on global efforts to control Anopheles mosquitoes, briefly reviewing the history of world-wide programs led by the World Health Organization, and emphasizing the need for qualified personnel to design, implement, and evaluate vector control interventions. Although incidence of malaria has declined in some areas between 2015 and 2022, the global incidence and mortality rate continues to be much higher than the target outlined in the sustainable development goals. Despite the geographical reduction in malaria-endemic regions, surveillance shows disturbing trends including the invasion of species to other areas, the presence of species once thought to be eradicated, the discovery of Anopheles stephensi , a day-biting efficient vector from Asia, and a severe shortage of healthcare workers and field public health entomologists in malaria-endemic areas, with the highest burden continuing to be in the WHO African region. Factors including adaptation of vectors, territorial expansion of new vectors, insecticide resistance, and climate change have complicated the worldwide situation. At the heart of malaria control and elimination, Anopheles control is of undisputed importance. Malaria continues to be a significant global health burden and goals for its reduction have not been met. The scarcity of properly trained public health entomologists and a lack of properly managed vector control programs is a challenge that must be addressed. Countries suffering from a high burden of malaria need field entomologists to provide technical information and guidance on vector control activities so that communities can have simple and practical approaches to controlling malaria.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.010
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Tropical Medicine ReportsSame topicMosquito-borne diseases and controlFrench-language works237,207