Direct <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> Carbapenem Resistance and Carbapenemases Genotype Prediction by Al-MOF/TiO<sub>2</sub>@Au Cubic Heterostructures-Assisted Intact Bacterial Cells Metabolic Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) infections pose a significant threat to human health. Fast and accurate prediction of K. pneumoniae carbapenem resistance and carbapenemase genotype is critical for guiding antibiotic treatment and reducing mortality rates. In this study, we present a novel method using Al-MOF/TiO 2 @Au cubic heterostructures for the metabolic analysis of intact bacterial cells, enabling rapid diagnosis of CRKP and its carbapenemases genotype. The Al-MOF/TiO 2 @Au cubic composites display strong light absorption and high surface area, facilitating the in situ effective extraction of metabolic fingerprints from intact bacterial cells. Utilizing this method, we rapidly and sensitively extracted metabolic fingerprints from 169 clinical isolates of K. pneumoniae obtained from patients. Machine learning analysis of the metabolic fingerprint changes successfully distinguishes CRKP from the sensitive strains, achieving the high area under the curve (AUC) values of 1.00 in both training and testing sets based on the 254 m / z features, respectively. Additionally, this platform enables rapid carbapenemase genotype discrimination of CRKP for precision antibiotic therapy. Our strategy holds great potential for swift diagnosis of CRKP and carbapenemase genotype discrimination, guiding effective management of CRKP bacterial infections in both hospital and community settings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".