Insight into ocular complications of West Nile Virus: A case report of chorioretinal scarring
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: This case report aims to emphasize the significance of the ocular manifestations in individuals with West Nile Virus (WNV) infection, with primary neurological involvement. By presenting a case of chorioretinal scarring secondary to WNV, we highlight the importance of a thorough ophthalmological evaluation in suspected cases of WNV to identify potential sight-threatening complications. Observations: A 63-year-old woman presented with neurological symptoms following a trip to Denver, USA, including headaches, fever, and decreased consciousness. Despite initial treatment for suspected meningoencephalitis, her condition deteriorated, leading to focal seizures and profound weakness. Ophthalmological examination revealed chorioretinal lesions consistent with WNV retinopathy. Conclusions: and Importance: WNV can present with neurological symptoms, and ocular complications can lead to significant visual impairment. This case report highlights the importance of asking individuals with suspected WNV about ocular symptoms. Despite the absence of a preventive treatment for ocular manifestations, clinicians must stay attentive to ocular symptoms in patients to mitigate potential complications, such as chorioretinal neovascularization, which can be treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy injections.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".