MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403428094 · doi:10.1016/j.psj.2024.104410

Effect of barley processing and enzyme supplementation on broiler performance, gut morphometry, and the occurrence of ascites syndrome in broiler chickens

2024· article· en· W4403428094 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Mina Zohrabi, Fariborz Khajali

Bibliographic record

VenuePoultry Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Nutrition and Physiology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Manitoba
KeywordsBroilerAscitesBiologyFood scienceAnimal scienceVeterinary medicineMedicineGastroenterology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An experiment was conducted to evaluate the nutritive value of processed barley grains and their influence upon growth performance, gut function, and the occurrence of ascites syndrome in broiler chickens. Day-old broilers (n=504) were randomly assigned to six treatments (3 levels of grain processing × 2 levels of enzyme supplementation). Results showed that chicks fed with germinated barley significantly gained more weight compared to unprocessed barley in all feeding stages (P = 0.0001). Chicks received roasted barley showed a slowdown in their growth so that their weight gain was significantly lower than the control and germinated barley groups in the finishing period and the entire experiment (P = 0.0001). Enzyme supplementation of barley-based diets improved weight gain so that a significant improvement was observed in the growing (P = 0.0002) and throughout the trial (P = 0.0098) over the unsupplemented diets. Chickens fed with germinated barley had a higher length of jejunal villi whereas they had a lower crypt depth compared to untreated or roasted barley groups. As a result, the ratio of villus length to crypt depth as well as villus absorptive surface were significantly higher in birds received germinated barley than those fed with unprocessed or roasted barley. Barley processing resulted in a lower viscosity of digesta in the jejunum so that both processing methods showed a significantly lower viscosity compared to unprocessed barley. Birds received unprocessed barley showed a significantly lower concentration of total cholesterol (P = 0.0370) and LDL-cholesterol (P < 0.01) than those received processed barley. Plasma uric acid (P = 0.0350) and total protein (P = 0.0050) concentrations were significantly greater in birds fed with germinated barley as opposed to other experimental treatments. The mortality from ascites was lower in broilers fed with germinated barley compared to untreated barley, particularly in the absence of NSP-degrading enzyme supplement. In conclusion, germinated barley could significantly improve the performance, gut morphometry, and ascites indices of broiler chickens when compared to untreated barley.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePoultry ScienceSame topicAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207