Soteriology, Human Soul and Eternity: Towards Addressing Salvation in African Thought
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The study discusses the African understanding of soteriology as it relates to the soul and eternity positing that salvation is a complete system among the African people. The human soul is a central element in Christian discourse of salvation and eternity. This study attempt a Christian soteriological discourse that hinges on the salvation made available for African soul through Christ‟s Incarnation, Death, Resurrection, Ascension and Second Coming. As such, it addresses the intrinsic need for redemption and reconciliation with God, freedom from oppression, physical healing and prosperity of the soul. This study employs intercultural hermeneutical method and socio-theological analysis through the use of secondary sources to analyse human soul, eternity in African and Christian thought patterns and its implication for Afro-Christian soteriological discourse. The study reveals that soteriological discourse in African culture is a one sided discussion either one that reiterates the body and neglect the soul or the soul and neglect the body which makes it a dysfunctional concept. However, the study recommends that a soteriological discussion that will be contextual and relevant in Africa must speak and impact the spirit, soul and body of human with the guarantee of eternity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".