MétaCan
← all works

Reflections on co-researching AI literacy

2024· article· en· 1 citations· W4403430037 on OpenAlex· 10.15173/ijsap.v8i2.5834

Why is this work in the frame?

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

Canadian venueIt was published in a Canadian venue.

No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame — the usual design — would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

The three-model screen

all 1,000 screened works →

1 of 3 models called this metaresearch. This work is contested: it sits on the field's empirical boundary, and whether it counts depends on which model you asked. It is one of the 51 works in the disagreement dossier.

stratum: venue_new · design weight: 2684.25 (the sample is stratified; any rate computed without the weight is wrong)
Claude Opus 4.8T3 · adjacent, not in scope
genre: editorial/commentary
about Canada: no
confidence: low

Reflective case study on a students-as-partners co-research project, with recommendations on roles and recognizing student input; commentary touching on how collaborative inquiry is conducted, so contextual at most.

GPT-5.6 (high)T1
genre: empirical
about Canada: no
confidence: medium

The case study explicitly examines co-researching practices and the challenges of partnership in conducting research.

Grok 4.5OUT
genre: conceptual
about Canada: no
confidence: medium

Case reflection on Students-as-Partners pedagogy for AI literacy teaching, not study of research as an object.

Abstract

Students as Partners (SaP) approaches have gained more and more traction in higher education in recent years (Dai & Matthews, 2022). Rooted in values such as reciprocity and shared responsibility, SaP can offer opportunities for internationalizing the curriculum and departing from traditional teacher-student hierarchies (Green & Baxter, 2022). This case study focuses on a SaP project involving international students and their English for Academic Purposes (EAP) teacher, which investigated artificial intelligence (AI) literacy during a UK pre-sessional course in summer 2023. The project identified that learning about the limitations of AI, in addition to developing skills for effective prompt writing, was beneficial to students (Partridge et al, 2023). This case study reflects on the challenges and benefits of SaP for both students and the teacher using the Advance HE (2016) Framework for Student Engagement Through Partnership. Based on these reflections, the case study offers recommendations for future SaP projects including effective scheduling, defining roles, engaging in continual reflection, and formally recognising student input.

Stored with the screening record, where it is evidence for the labels above.

The record

Venue
International Journal for Students as Partners
Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Field
Computer Science
Canadian institutions
Funders
Keywords
LiteracySociologyPsychologyPedagogy
Has abstract in OpenAlex
yes