MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403436555 · doi:10.18805/ijar.b-5391

Epidemiological Aspects of Renal Disorders in Dogs at South-Saurastra Region of Gujarat- A Prospective Study

2024· article· en· W4403436555 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Avinash K. Bilwal, A. A. Vagh, R.H. Bhatt, Vijay L. Parmar, J.V. Vadaliya, V.R. Baria

Bibliographic record

VenueIndian Journal of Animal Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHepatitis B Virus Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpidemiologyMedicineVeterinary medicineEnvironmental healthProspective cohort studyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Kidney plays a major role in eliminating metabolic wastes from body, in maintaining acid-base balance and production of hormones. Due to their anatomic and physiologic features, kidneys are most susceptible to toxicity and ischemia. No study has been carried out to assess the renal disorders in dog in this region. Hence, the epidemiological study was carried out to record renal disorders in dogs at Junagadh. Methods: The assessment of the incidence of renal disorders in dogs was performed in the hospital cases presented at Veterinary Clinical Complex, COVSAH, KU from September 2022 to August 2023. A total of 2850 caseloads of dogs with different ailments were screened, out of which 170 dogs were diagnosed as renal disorders based on clinical presentation, hematology, serum biochemistry, urine analysis and nephrosonography. Result: The overall incidence of renal disorders in dogs was 5.96%. The higher occurrence of renal disorders was noted in age group of 6-8 years (9.62%) and males (6.61%). The dog breeds that were found higher incidence were Labrador retriever (9.68%) followed by German shepherd (7.24%). Month and Season wise higher incidence was recorded in the month of October (10%) of monsoon (7.61%) season. The highest recorded incidence of renal disorder was nephritis and renal failure (AKI/CKD) (each 35.88%).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.570

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.119
GPT teacher head0.426
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndian Journal of Animal ResearchSame topicHepatitis B Virus StudiesFrench-language works237,207